Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698297›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

The Knowledge of Autism Questionnaire-UK: Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.

Sophie Langhorne, Nora Uglik-Marucha, Charlotte Broadhurst, Elena Lieven, Amelia Pearson, Silia Vitoratou, Kathy Leadbitter

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie LanghorneDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Nora Uglik-MaruchaPsychometrics & Measurement Lab, Biostatistics and Health Informatics Department, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Charlotte BroadhurstDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Elena LievenDepartment of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Amelia PearsonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Silia VitoratouPsychometrics & Measurement Lab, Biostatistics and Health Informatics Department, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK. silia.vitoratou@kcl.ac.uk.
Kathy LeadbitterDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. kathy.leadbitter@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-2800

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme 17/80/09National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR302618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tools to measure autism knowledge are needed to assess levels of understanding within particular groups of people and to evaluate whether awareness-raising campaigns or interventions lead to improvements in understanding. Several such measures are in circulation, but, to our knowledge, there are no psychometrically-validated questionnaires that assess contemporary autism knowledge suitable to the UK context. We aimed to produce a brief measure to assess between-respondent variability and within-respondent change over time. A pool of questionnaire items was developed and refined through a multi-stage iterative process involving autism experts and a lay sample. Attention was paid to face validity, clarity, consensus on correct responses, and appropriate difficulty levels. Initial validation data was obtained from a lay sample of 201 people. Difficulty and discrimination ability were assessed using item response theory and low-performing items were removed. Dimensionality was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis, which revealed a one-factor structure of the questionnaire. Further items were removed where they did not load strongly on their main factor. This process resulted in a final 14-item questionnaire called the Knowledge of Autism Questionnaire-UK. Internal consistency was satisfactory, and the final questionnaire was able to distinguish between parents of autistic people and those without an affiliation to autism. The KAQ-UK is a new, freely-available measure of autism knowledge that could be used to assess between-respondent variability and within-respondent change over time. Further evaluation and validation of its measurement properties are required.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultAutismKnowledgeMeasurementQuestionnaireUnderstanding

Identifiers

PMID38698297
PMCPMC12167355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.