Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698208›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Computational drug repositioning with attention walking.

Jong-Hoon Park, Young-Rae Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Link Prediction in Multipartite Graphs With Application to Drug Repositioning Studies.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jong-Hoon ParkDivision of Software, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju-si, 26493, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Young-Rae ChoDivision of Software, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju-si, 26493, Gangwon-do, Korea. youngcho@yonsei.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Education (Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea) 2022RIS-005National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)Science 2021R1A2C1011946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repositioning aims to identify new therapeutic indications for approved medications. Recently, the importance of computational drug repositioning has been highlighted because it can reduce the costs, development time, and risks compared to traditional drug discovery. Most approaches in this area use networks for systematic analysis. Inferring drug-disease associations is then defined as a link prediction problem in a heterogeneous network composed of drugs and diseases. In this article, we present a novel method of computational drug repositioning, named drug repositioning with attention walking (DRAW). DRAW proceeds as follows: first, a subgraph enclosing the target link for prediction is extracted. Second, a graph convolutional network captures the structural features of the labeled nodes in the subgraph. Third, the transition probabilities are computed using attention mechanisms and converted into random walk profiles. Finally, a multi-layer perceptron takes random walk profiles and predicts whether a target link exists. As an experiment, we constructed two heterogeneous networks with drug-drug similarities based on chemical structures and anatomical therapeutic chemical classification (ATC) codes. Using 10-fold cross-validation, DRAW achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.903 and outperformed state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, we demonstrated the results of case studies for selected drugs and diseases to further confirm the capability of DRAW to predict drug-disease associations.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryHumansNeural Networks, ComputerROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID38698208
PMCPMC11066070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.