Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698163›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

An automated approach for real-time informative frames classification in laryngeal endoscopy using deep learning.

Chiara Baldini, Muhammad Adeel Azam, Claudio Sampieri, Alessandro Ioppi, Laura Ruiz-Sevilla, Isabel Vilaseca, Berta Alegre, Alessandro Tirrito, Alessia Pennacchi, Giorgio Peretti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Current role of artificial intelligence and machine learning: is their application feasible in pediatric upper airway obstructive disorders?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. An interpretable multi-instance learning method for accurate differentiation of malignant and benign laryngeal lesions in laryngoscopy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multicenter Clinical Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Classification Model for Laryngoscopy Images.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Feasibility of improving vocal fold pathology image classification with synthetic images generated by DDPM-based GenAI: a pilot study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Democratizing cancer detection: artificial intelligence-enhanced endoscopy could address global disparities in head and neck cancer outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chiara BaldiniDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Muhammad Adeel AzamDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Claudio SampieriDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. claudio.sampieri@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2291
Alessandro IoppiUnit of Otolaryngology, Trento, Italy.
Laura Ruiz-SevillaOtorhinolaryngology Head-Neck Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain.
Isabel VilasecaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Clínic, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08029, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta AlegreDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Clínic, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08029, Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandro TirritoUnit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Alessia PennacchiUnit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Giorgio PerettiUnit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Sara MocciaThe BioRobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Leonardo S MattosDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInformative image selection in laryngoscopy has the potential for improving automatic data extraction alone, for selective data storage and a faster review process, or in combination with other artificial intelligence (AI) detection or diagnosis models. This paper aims to demonstrate the feasibility of AI in providing automatic informative laryngoscopy frame selection also capable of working in real-time providing visual feedback to guide the otolaryngologist during the examination.

methodsSeveral deep learning models were trained and tested on an internal dataset (n = 5147 images) and then tested on an external test set (n = 646 images) composed of both white light and narrow band images. Four videos were used to assess the real-time performance of the best-performing model.

resultsResNet-50, pre-trained with the pretext strategy, reached a precision = 95% vs. 97%, recall = 97% vs, 89%, and the F1-score = 96% vs. 93% on the internal and external test set respectively (p = 0.062). The four testing videos are provided in the supplemental materials.

conclusionThe deep learning model demonstrated excellent performance in identifying diagnostically relevant frames within laryngoscopic videos. With its solid accuracy and real-time capabilities, the system is promising for its development in a clinical setting, either autonomously for objective quality control or in conjunction with other algorithms within a comprehensive AI toolset aimed at enhancing tumor detection and diagnosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLaryngoscopyFeasibility StudiesHumansLaryngeal DiseasesVideo RecordingArtificial intelligenceDeep learningLaryngeal cancerLaryngoscopyLarynx

Identifiers

PMID38698163
PMCPMC11266252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.