Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698100›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Establishment of a novel protocol for assessing the severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage in circle Willis perforation mouse model.

Rui Zhang, Dilaware Khan, Sajjad Muhammad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Mooren Str. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Dilaware KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Mooren Str. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Sajjad MuhammadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Mooren Str. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany. sajjad.muhammad@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202108130055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Circle of Willis perforation (cWp) mouse model is a key tool in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) research; however, inconsistent bleeding volumes can challenge experimental reliability. To address this issue, we introduced the ROB Scoring System, a novel protocol integrating Rotarod Tests (RT), Open-field Tests (OT) video analysis, and daily Body Weight Loss (BWL) monitoring to precisely categorize SAH severity. Forty C57BL/6 mice underwent cWp SAH induction, categorized by ROB into severity subgroups (severe, moderate, mild). Validation compared ROB trends in subgroups, and ROB outcomes with autopsy results on postoperative days three and seven for acute and sub-acute evaluations. Mortality rates were analyzed via the survival log-rank test, revealing a significant difference among SAH subgroups (P < 0.05). Strong correlations between ROB grades and autopsy findings underscored its precision. Notably, the severe group exhibited 100% mortality within 4 days post SAH onset. Single parameters (RT, OT, BWL) were insufficient for distinguishing SAH severity levels. The ROB score represents a significant advancement, offering an objective method for precise categorization and addressing inherent bleeding variations in the cWp SAH model. This standardized protocol enhances the reliability and effectiveness of the SAH translational research, providing a valuable tool for future investigations into this critical area.

Indexed as

Circle of WillisDisease Models, AnimalMice, Inbred C57BLSubarachnoid HemorrhageAnimalsMaleMiceReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexCircle Willis perforation mouse modelNeurological assessmentROB scoreSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID38698100
PMCPMC11066000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.