Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38697991›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery.

Chibawanye I Ene, Christina Abi Faraj, Thomas H Beckham, Jeffrey S Weinberg, Clark R Andersen, Ali S Haider, Ganesh Rao, Sherise D Ferguson, Christopher A Alvarez-Brenkenridge, Betty Y S Kim and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Chibawanye I Ene *Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. cene@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-281X
Christina Abi Faraj *Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas H BeckhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeffrey S WeinbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-6673
Clark R AndersenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ali S HaiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ganesh RaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sherise D FergusonDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Christopher A Alvarez-BrenkenridgeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Betty Y S KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-8355
Amy B HeimbergerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-8695
Ian E McCutcheonDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-3400
Sujit S PrabhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chenyang Michael WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Amol J GhiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Susan L McGovernDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Caroline ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mary Frances McAleerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Martin C TomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Subha PerniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Todd A SwansonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Debra N YeboaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Tina M BriereDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jason T HuseDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gregory N FullerDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-2647
Frederick F LangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-873X
Jing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dima SukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Raymond E SawayaFaculty of Medicine and Medical Affairs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With improvements in survival for patients with metastatic cancer, long-term local control of brain metastases has become an increasingly important clinical priority. While consensus guidelines recommend surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lesions >3 cm, smaller lesions (≤3 cm) treated with SRS alone elicit variable responses. To determine factors influencing this variable response to SRS, we analyzed outcomes of brain metastases ≤3 cm diameter in patients with no prior systemic therapy treated with frame-based single-fraction SRS. Following SRS, 259 out of 1733 (15%) treated lesions demonstrated MRI findings concerning for local treatment failure (LTF), of which 202 /1733 (12%) demonstrated LTF and 54/1733 (3%) had an adverse radiation effect. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size (>1.5 cm) and melanoma histology were associated with higher LTF rates. Our results demonstrate that brain metastases ≤3 cm are not uniformly responsive to SRS and suggest that prospective studies to evaluate the effect of SRS alone or in combination with surgery on brain metastases ≤3 cm matched by tumor size and histology are warranted. These studies will help establish multi-disciplinary treatment guidelines that improve local control while minimizing radiation necrosis during treatment of brain metastasis ≤3 cm.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID38697991
PMCPMC11066027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.