Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38697981›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A sparse quantized hopfield network for online-continual memory.

Nicholas Alonso, Jeffrey L Krichmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Episodic-Like Memory in a Simulation of Cuttlefish Behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas AlonsoDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. nalonso2@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-8416
Jeffrey L KrichmarDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-2468

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) ID 2024633United States Department of Defense | United States Air Force | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AF Office of Scientific Research) FA9550-19-1- 0306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important difference between brains and deep neural networks is the way they learn. Nervous systems learn online where a stream of noisy data points are presented in a non-independent, identically distributed way. Further, synaptic plasticity in the brain depends only on information local to synapses. Deep networks, on the other hand, typically use non-local learning algorithms and are trained in an offline, non-noisy, independent, identically distributed setting. Understanding how neural networks learn under the same constraints as the brain is an open problem for neuroscience and neuromorphic computing. A standard approach to this problem has yet to be established. In this paper, we propose that discrete graphical models that learn via an online maximum a posteriori learning algorithm could provide such an approach. We implement this kind of model in a neural network called the Sparse Quantized Hopfield Network. We show our model outperforms state-of-the-art neural networks on associative memory tasks, outperforms these networks in online, continual settings, learns efficiently with noisy inputs, and is better than baselines on an episodic memory task.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerBrainDeep LearningHumansMemoryModels, NeurologicalNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID38697981
PMCPMC11065890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.