Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38697940›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2024

Circulating extracellular vesicle characteristics differ between men and women following 12 weeks of concurrent exercise training.

Christopher K Kargl, Adam J Sterczala, Daniella Santucci, William R Conkright, Kellen T Krajewski, Brian J Martin, Julie P Greeves, Thomas J O'Leary, Sophie L Wardle, Amrita Sahu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Exercise Training Stimulates the Release of Glutathione Peroxidase 1 (GPX1)-Enriched Extracellular Vesicles That Promote Angiogenesis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher K KarglNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-8274
Adam J SterczalaNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-6836
Daniella SantucciNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
William R ConkrightNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kellen T KrajewskiNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brian J MartinNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julie P GreevesArmy Health and Performance Research, Army Headquarters, Andover, UK.
Thomas J O'LearyArmy Health and Performance Research, Army Headquarters, Andover, UK.
Sophie L WardleArmy Health and Performance Research, Army Headquarters, Andover, UK.
Amrita SahuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fabrisia AmbrosioDiscovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bradley C NindlNeuromuscular Research Lab/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-5930

Funding

United Kingdom Ministry of Defense WGCC 5.5.6 - Task 0107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concurrent resistance and endurance exercise training (CET) has well-studied benefits; however, inherent hormonal and genetic differences alter adaptive responses to exercise between sexes. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are factors that contribute to adaptive signaling. Our purpose was to test if EV characteristics differ between men and women following CET. 18 young healthy participants underwent 12-weeks of CET. Prior to and following CET, subjects performed an acute bout of heavy resistance exercise (AHRET) consisting of 6 × 10 back squats at 75% 1RM. At rest and following AHRET, EVs were isolated from plasma and characteristics and miRNA contents were analyzed. AHRET elevated EV abundance in trained men only (+51%) and AHRET-induced changes were observed for muscle-derived EVs and microvesicles. There were considerable sex-specific effects of CET on EV miRNAs, highlighted by larger variation following the 12-week program in men compared to women at rest. Pathway analysis based on differentially expressed EV miRNAs predicted that AHRET and 12 weeks of CET in men positively regulates hypertrophy and growth pathways more so than in women. This report highlights sex-based differences in the EV response to resistance and concurrent exercise training and suggests that EVs may be important adaptive signaling factors altered by exercise training.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMicroRNAsResistance TrainingAdultEndurance TrainingExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsYoung AdultMicroRNAsexerciseextracellular vesiclessex differences

Identifiers

PMID38697940
PMCPMC11065700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.