Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38697776›Full record

Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2025

Bilateral ultrasound-guided maxillary and mandibular combined nerves block reduces morphine consumption after double-jaw orthognathic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Thomas Esquerré, Marion Mure, Vincent Minville, Alice Prevost, Frédéric Lauwers, Fabrice Ferré

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05351151 (Analgesic Efficacy of Echoguided Maxillary and Mandibular Nerve Blocks in Planned Maxillomandibular Osteotomy Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05351151 nacompletednot on this map

Analgesic Efficacy of Echoguided Maxillary and Mandibular Nerve Blocks in Planned Maxillomandibular Osteotomy Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToulouseRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsPain, Post Operative, Regional AnesthesiaArmsbilateral ultra-sound guided maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks, Infiltration of Lidocaine 1%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas Esquerré *Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France esquerre.t@chu-toulouse.fr.ORCID 0009-0004-8855-0994
Marion Mure *Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Vincent MinvilleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0516-4939
Alice PrevostDepartment of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2903-0644
Frédéric LauwersDepartment of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2893-5954
Fabrice FerréDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-7454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDouble-jaw surgeries are known to be painful and to require opioids. Maxillary (V2) and mandibular (V3) nerves block could provide adequate pain management with minimal opioid-related side effects. Our main objective was to evaluate the analgesic effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided V2 and V3 combined nerves block in patients undergoing double-jaw orthognathic surgery.

methodsIn this single-blind, randomized control study, 50 patients were prospectively allocated to either bilateral ultrasound-guided V2 and V3 combined nerves block or intraoral infiltration of local anesthetic. Primary outcome was the cumulative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption assessed at postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes were cumulative OME consumption and pain scores in recovery room and at postoperative day 2, intraoperative anesthetic consumption, and opioid-related side effects. Preoperative anxiety was investigated by the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).

resultsCompared with infiltration, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia reduced cumulative OME consumption on day 1 (45.7±37.6 mg vs 25.5±19.8 mg, respectively, mean difference of -20.1 (95% CI -37.4 to -2.9) mg, p=0.023) and day 2 (64.5±60 mg vs 35.8±30.2 mg, respectively, mean difference of -28.7 (95% CI -55.9 to -1.43) mg, p=0.040). Interestingly, worst pain score and cumulative OME consumptions on day 2 were positively correlated with the APAIS (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.42 (p=0.003) and 0.39 (p=0.006), respectively).

conclusionBilateral ultrasound-guided V2 and V3 combined nerves block reduces postoperative opioid consumption by about 50% in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05351151.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidMandibular NerveMaxillary NerveMorphineNerve BlockOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PainUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineNerve BlockPain, PostoperativeREGIONAL ANESTHESIAUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38697776
PMCPMC12322447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.