Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38697766›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Hospital at home for elderly acute patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Anne Marie Ladehoff Thomsen, Nasrin Tayyari, Iben Duvald, Hans Kirkegaard, Børge Obel, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05360914 (Improving and Evaluation of a New Cross-sectoral Hospital at Home Model for Elderly Acute Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05360914 narecruitingnot on this map

Improving and Evaluation of a New Cross-sectoral Hospital at Home Model for Elderly Acute Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorDefactum, Central Denmark RegionRan2022 to 2027Enrolled849ConditionsCystitis, Erysipelas, PneumoniaArmsHospital at Home (HaH) treatment, Standard hospital admission
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne Marie Ladehoff ThomsenCentral Denmark Region, Defactum, Aarhus, Denmark amlthomsen@ph.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5972-4391
Nasrin TayyariCentral Denmark Region, Defactum, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-5003
Iben DuvaldInterdisciplinary Centre for Organizational Architecture, Department of Management, Aarhus University School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hans KirkegaardResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Børge ObelInterdisciplinary Centre for Organizational Architecture, Department of Management, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus, Denmark.
Camilla Palmhøj NielsenCentral Denmark Region, Defactum, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing elderly population has led to a growing demand for healthcare services. A hospital at home treatment model offers an alternative to standard hospital admission, with the potential to reduce readmission and healthcare consumption while improving patients' quality of life. However, there is little evidence regarding hospital at home treatment in a Danish setting. This article describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard hospital admission to hospital at home treatment. The main aim of the intervention is to reduce 30-day acute readmission after discharge and improve the quality of life of elderly acute patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 849 elderly acute patients will be randomised in a 1:2 ratio to either the control or intervention group in the trial. The control group will receive standard hospital treatment in a hospital emergency department while the intervention group will receive treatment at home. The primary outcomes of the trial are the rate of 30-day acute readmission and quality of life, assessed using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5-Level instrument. Primary analyses are based on the intention-to-treat principle. Secondary outcomes are basic functional mobility, resource use in healthcare, primary and secondary healthcare cost, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and the mortality rate 3 months after discharge. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RCT was approved by the Ethical Committee, Central Denmark Region (no. 1-10-72-67-20). Results will be presented at relevant national and international meetings and conferences and will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. Furthermore, we plan to communicate the results to relevant stakeholders in the Danish healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05360914.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisDenmarkEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHome Care ServicesHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHospitalizationHumansMalePatient DischargeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEAgedClinical TrialHEALTH ECONOMICS

Identifiers

PMID38697766
PMCPMC11086463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.