Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38697618›Full record

Trial reportJNCI cancer spectrum2024

A phase I/II study of nintedanib and capecitabine for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Patrick M Boland, John M L Ebos, Kristopher Attwood, Michalis Mastri, Christos Fountzilas, Renuka V Iyer, Christopher Banker, Andrew K L Goey, Robert Bies, Wen Wee Ma and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02393755 (A Phase I/II Study of Nintedanib and Capecitabine in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02393755 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase I/II Study of Nintedanib and Capecitabine in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoswell Park Cancer InstituteRan2015 to 2021Enrolled42ConditionsColon Adenocarcinoma, Rectal Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Colon Carcinoma, Recurrent Rectal CarcinomaArmsCapecitabine, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Nintedanib, Pharmacological Study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. KRASMolecular oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patrick M BolandDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4213-8847
John M L EbosDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Genomics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kristopher AttwoodDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Michalis MastriDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Genomics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Christos FountzilasDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Renuka V IyerDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Christopher BankerDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Andrew K L GoeyDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Robert BiesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Wen Wee MaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marwan FakihDepartment of Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-5488

Funding

Boehringer IngelheimNational Comprehensive Cancer Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in bevacizumab-resistant colorectal cancer models. This phase I/II study evaluated the recommended phase II dose and efficacy of nintedanib and capecitabine in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

methodsKey eligibility criteria included refractory metastatic colorectal cancer and ECOG performance status of 1 or lower. The primary endpoint was 18-week progression-free survival (PFS). A 1-sided binomial test (at α = .1) compared the observed 18-week PFS with a historic control of .25.

resultsForty-two patients were enrolled, including 39 at the recommended phase II dose. The recommended phase II dose was established to be nintedanib 200 mg by mouth twice daily and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 by mouth twice daily. The protocol was evaluated for efficacy in 36 patients. The 18-week PFS was 42% (15/36 patients; P = .0209). Median PFS was 3.4 mo. Median overall survival was 8.9 mo. Sixteen (44%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 adverse event, most commonly fatigue (8%), palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (8%), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (6%), asthenia (6%), pulmonary embolus (6%), and dehydration (6%). Osteopontin levels at cycle 1, day 1 and cycle 3, day 1 as well as ΔCCL2 levels correlated to disease control at 18 weeks.

conclusionsThe combination of nintedanib and capecitabine is well tolerated. Clinical efficacy appears to be superior to regorafenib or tipiracil hydrochloride monotherapy. Further investigation of similar combinations is warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02393755.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsIndolesProgression-Free SurvivalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBilirubinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFatigueFemaleHand-Foot SyndromeHumansMaleMiddle AgedBilirubinCapecitabineIndolesnintedanib

Identifiers

PMID38697618
PMCPMC11065487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.