Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696938›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2024

Application of an egocentric social network approach to examine changes in social connections following treatment for anxiety and depression: A novel measurement tool for clinical trials research?

Madeleine Rassaby, Holly B Shakya, James H Fowler, Christopher Oveis, William J Sieber, Sonia Jain, Murray B Stein, Charles T Taylor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madeleine RassabySan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, United States.
Holly B ShakyaUniversity of California San Diego, United States.
James H FowlerUniversity of California San Diego, United States.
Christopher OveisUniversity of California San Diego, United States.
William J SieberUniversity of California San Diego, United States.
Sonia JainUniversity of California San Diego, United States.
Murray B SteinSan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, United States; University of California San Diego, United States.
Charles T TaylorSan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, United States; University of California San Diego, United States. Electronic address: c1taylor@health.ucsd.edu.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000100 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2012 to 2015
$19.7M
Novel Behavioral Intervention to Target Social Reward Sensitivity and AttachmentR33MH113769 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TAYLOR, CHARLES · 2020 to 2022
$2.2M
Novel Behavioral Intervention to Target Social Reward Sensitivity and AttachmentR61MH113769 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TAYLOR, CHARLES · 2017 to 2018
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000100NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH113769NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH113769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemic of loneliness and social isolation has been recognized as a public health crisis warranting the same prioritization as other public health issues today, such as obesity, substance use disorders, and tobacco use. Social disconnection is particularly prevalent and disabling among individuals with anxiety and depression, yet it is inadequately evaluated and addressed in most clinical psychology treatment research. Studies generally employ global measures of perceived connectedness, loneliness, or relationship satisfaction, limiting understanding about elements of one's social network that may change with treatment. This study examined changes in the degree (number of people nominated) and quality of one's social network from pre-to post-treatment using an egocentric social network approach in 59 adults (mean age = 30.8 years, range = 18 to 54) with clinically elevated anxiety or depression who were randomized to a cognitive and behavioral positive valence treatment versus waitlist. Participants (egos) named people in their lives (alters) with whom they discussed important issues or spent free time. For each alter, participants rated how close they felt, how close they thought the alter felt to them, and how frequently they communicated. Linear regressions, which included treatment group as a predictor, revealed no group differences in changes in network degree, perceived alter feelings of closeness, or communication frequency, despite prior findings from this sample indicating larger increases in perceived global connectedness in the treatment group. Unexpectedly, the control group reported a greater increase in perceived closeness to alters. Post-hoc analyses revealed this was explained by the treatment group identifying more distal social ties (e.g., extended family, colleagues, roommates) as alters following treatment - an outcome positively associated with global improvements in connectedness. This proof-of-concept study suggests egocentric social network surveys may provide unique information on treatment-related changes in social functioning. Suggestions are provided for adaptations to facilitate application of social network surveys to mental health treatment research.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdolescentAdultAnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial NetworkingYoung AdultAnxietyDepressionSocial disconnectionSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID38696938
PMCPMC12063732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.