ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Streamlining Computational Fragment-Based Drug Discovery through Evolutionary Optimization Informed by Ligand-Based Virtual Prescreening.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- AI-driven generative framework integrating ML-QSAR and fragment learning for isoform-selective PI3K inhibitor design.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Ultrahigh-Throughput Virtual Screening Strategies against PPI Targets: A Case Study of STAT Inhibitors.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- A new paradigm for drug discovery in the treatment of complex diseases: drug discovery and optimization.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in computational methods provide the promise of dramatically accelerating drug discovery. While mathematical modeling and machine learning have become vital in predicting drug-target interactions and properties, there is untapped potential in computational drug discovery due to the vast and complex chemical space. This paper builds on our recently published computational fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) method called fragment databases from screened ligand drug discovery (FDSL-DD). FDSL-DD uses in silico screening to identify ligands from a vast library, fragmenting them while attaching specific attributes based on predicted binding affinity and interaction with the target subdomain. In this paper, we further propose a two-stage optimization method that utilizes the information from prescreening to optimize computational ligand synthesis. We hypothesize that using prescreening information for optimization shrinks the search space and focuses on promising regions, thereby improving the optimization for candidate ligands. The first optimization stage assembles these fragments into larger compounds using genetic algorithms, followed by a second stage of iterative refinement to produce compounds with enhanced bioactivity. To demonstrate broad applicability, the methodology is demonstrated on three diverse protein targets found in human solid cancers, bacterial antimicrobial resistance, and the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Combined, the proposed FDSL-DD and a two-stage optimization approach yield high-affinity ligand candidates more efficiently than other state-of-the-art computational FBDD methods. We further show that a multiobjective optimization method accounting for drug-likeness can still produce potential candidate ligands with a high binding affinity. Overall, the results demonstrate that integrating detailed chemical information with a constrained search framework can markedly optimize the initial drug discovery process, offering a more precise and efficient route to developing new therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.