Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Hepcidin, in contrast to heparin binding protein, does not portend acute kidney injury in patients with community acquired septic shock.

Jon Olinder, Matilda Jovanovic Stjernqvist, Albin Lindén, Evelina Thaphikul Salomonsson, Martin Annborn, Heiko Herwald, Cecilia Rydén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomarkers as Beacons: Illuminating Sepsis-Associated Hepato-Renal Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jon OlinderDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3223-6769
Matilda Jovanovic StjernqvistDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Albin LindénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Evelina Thaphikul SalomonssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-8431-6232
Martin AnnbornDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Sections of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Heiko HerwaldDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cecilia RydénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication in patients treated at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The pathogenesis of AKI has been reported to involve hypoperfusion, diminished oxygenation, systemic inflammation, and damage by increased intracellular iron concentration. Hepcidin, a regulator of iron metabolism, has been shown to be associated with sepsis and septic shock, conditions that can result in AKI. Heparin binding protein (HBP) has been reported to be associated with sepsis and AKI. The aim of the present study was to compare serum hepcidin and heparin binding protein (HBP) levels in relation to AKI in patients admitted to the ICU.

methodsOne hundred and forty patients with community acquired illness admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after first arrival to the hospital were included in the study. Eighty five of these patients were diagnosed with sepsis and 55 with other severe non-septic conditions. Logistic and linear regression models were created to evaluate possible correlations between circulating hepcidin and heparin-binding protein (HBP), stage 2-3 AKI, peak serum creatinine levels, and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).

resultsDuring the 7-day study period, 52% of the 85 sepsis and 33% of the 55 non-sepsis patients had been diagnosed with AKI stage 2-3 already at inclusion. The need for RRT was 20% and 15%, respectively, in the groups. Hepcidin levels at admission were significantly higher in the sepsis group compared to the non-sepsis group but these levels did not significantly correlate to the development of stage 2-3 AKI in the sepsis group (p = 0.189) nor in the non-sepsis group (p = 0.910). No significant correlation between hepcidin and peak creatinine levels, nor with the need for RRT was observed. Stage 2-3 AKI correlated, as expected, significantly with HBP levels at admission in both groups (Odds Ratio 1.008 (CI 1.003-1.014, p = 0.005), the need for RRT, as well as with peak creatinine in septic patients.

conclusionInitial serum hepcidin, and HBP levels in patients admitted to the ICU are biomarkers for septic shock but in contrast to HBP, hepcidin does not portend progression of disease into AKI or a later need for RRT. Since hepcidin is a key regulator of iron metabolism our present data do not support a decisive role of initial iron levels in the progression of septic shock into AKI.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBlood ProteinsHepcidinsShock, SepticAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCarrier ProteinsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCreatinineFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAZU1 protein, humanBiomarkersBlood ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCreatinineHepcidins

Identifiers

PMID38696394
PMCPMC11065221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.