Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Fostering proactive work behavior: Where to start?

A Yuspahruddin, Hafid Abbas, Indra Pahala, Anis Eliyana, Zaleha Yazid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A YuspahruddinPostgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hafid AbbasPostgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Indra PahalaPostgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
Anis EliyanaDepartment of Management, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2172-5935
Zaleha YazidFaculty of Economics and Management, School of Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4826-5513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study underscores the significance of assessing the capabilities of rehabilitation officers in navigating challenges, devising innovative work methods, and successfully executing the rehabilitation process. This is particularly crucial amid the dual challenges of overcapacity and the repercussions of the Covid-19 pandemic, making it an essential area for research. To be specific, it aims to obtain empirical evidence about the influence of proactive personality and supportive supervision on proactive work behavior, as well as the mediating role of Role Breadth Self-efficacy and Change Orientation. This research was conducted on all rehabilitation officers at the Narcotics Penitentiary in Sumatra, totaling 272 respondents. This study employs a quantitative method via a questionnaire using a purposive sampling technique. The data was subsequently examined using the Lisrel 8.70 software and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). It can be concluded from the results that the rehabilitation officers for narcotics addicts at the Narcotics Penitentiary can create and improve proactive work behavior properly through the influence of proactive personality, supportive supervision, role breadth self-efficacy, and change orientation. The study may suggest new ways of working and generate new ideas to increase initiative, encourage feedback, and voice employee concerns. Furthermore, this research has the potential to pinpoint deficiencies in proactive work behavior, serving as a foundation for designing interventions or training programs. These initiatives aim to enhance the innovative and creative contributions of rehabilitation officers in the rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

COVID-19Self EfficacyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38696381
PMCPMC11065301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.