Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696380›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Clear aligner's adverse effects: A systematic review protocol.

Cintia Ronchi Lemos, Marianella Aguilar Ventura Fadel, Helena Polmann, Júlia Meller Dias de Oliveira, Patrícia Pauletto, Cristine Miron Stefani, Carlos Flores-Mir, Graziela De Luca Canto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Longitudinal analysis of bite force and strength of orofacial tissues during orthodontic aligner treatment.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cintia Ronchi LemosBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Marianella Aguilar Ventura FadelBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Helena PolmannBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Júlia Meller Dias de OliveiraBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Patrícia PaulettoSchool of Dentistry, Universidad De Las Américas (UDLA), Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-7059
Cristine Miron StefaniBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), University of Brasilia (UNB), Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4712-9779
Carlos Flores-MirDepartment of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Graziela De Luca CantoBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing popularity of clear aligners, more patients have chosen to use them instead of traditional orthodontic braces to correct their malocclusions. Clear aligners offer distinct advantages over conventional fixed braces, such as limited aesthetic impact, the convenience of easily removing them for meals, improved accessibility for brushing and flossing, and a treatment approach that avoids the use of metal, minimizing potential irritation to the cheeks and gums. Manufacturers point out a disadvantage that can be administered in this type of treatment. Still, to our knowledge, a comprehensive review of the published literature assessing the adverse/negative effects of clear aligners has not yet been conducted. A systematic review, with or without meta-analysis, will be performed. The inclusion criteria will be studies involving individuals using clear aligners and reporting potential adverse/negative effects during or after treatment. No restrictions about time or language will be applied. The studies screening will be conducted in two stages. Two independent reviewers will initially evaluate the title and abstract under the eligibility criteria. Subsequently, the same two reviewers will examine the articles' full text in-depth. The results will be synthesized in the form of a narrative description and incorporate a meta-analysis if justified. Furthermore, we will present details regarding the sample characteristics, intervention, study objectives, methodologies employed, and primary findings. This study aims to investigate the potential adverse effects and their frequency among orthodontic patients wearing clear aligners. Moreover, the outcomes of this review have the potential to illuminate specific inherent limitations of aligner therapy as a comprehensive orthodontic approach.

Indexed as

Systematic Reviews as TopicHumansMalocclusion

Identifiers

PMID38696380
PMCPMC11065214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.