ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2024
Validation of an Automated, End-to-End Metagenomic Sequencing Assay for Agnostic Detection of Respiratory Viruses.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Metagenomic sequencing identifies potential respiratory pathogens in PCR-negative subset of surveillance samples.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sensitive, flexible, and affordable serum RNA sequencing for pathogen detection on the Oxford Nanopore platform.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Rapid clinical validation of an RNA/DNA hybrid tagmentation-based metagenomic workflow for respiratory RNA virus detection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical metagenomics for diagnosis and surveillance of viral pathogens.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Nanopore sequencing enables rapid diagnosis and drug resistance profiling in refractoryAmerican journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Development and performance evaluation of a clinical metagenomics approach for identifying pathogens in the whole blood from patients with undifferentiated fever.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent molecular diagnostics are limited in the number and type of detectable pathogens. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is an emerging, and increasingly feasible, pathogen-agnostic diagnostic approach. Translational barriers prohibit the widespread adoption of this technology in clinical laboratories. We validate an end-to-end mNGS assay for detection of respiratory viruses. Our assay is optimized to reduce turnaround time, lower cost per sample, increase throughput, and deploy secure and actionable bioinformatic results.
methodsWe validated our assay using residual nasopharyngeal swab specimens from Vancouver General Hospital (n = 359), which were reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction positive, or negative for influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and respiratory syncytial virus. We quantified sample stability, assay precision, the effect of background nucleic acid levels, and analytical limits of detection. Diagnostic performance metrics were estimated.
resultsWe report that our mNGS assay is highly precise and semiquantitative, with analytical limits of detection ranging from 103 to 104 copies/mL. Our assay is highly specific (100%) and sensitive (61.9% overall: 86.8%; reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold < 30). Multiplexing capabilities enable processing of up to 55 specimens simultaneously on an Oxford Nanopore GridION device, with results reported within 12 hours.
conclusionsThis study report outlines the diagnostic performance and feasibility of mNGS for respiratory viral diagnostics, infection control, and public health surveillance. We addressed translational barriers to widespread mNGS adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.