Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696269›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

Wright's Hierarchical F-Statistics.

Marcy K Uyenoyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marcy K UyenoyamaDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-1103

Funding

MATHEMATICAL POPULATION GENETICSR01GM037841 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI UYENOYAMA, MARCY K · 1986 to 2013
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037841Public Health Service GM 37841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective article offers a meditation on FST and other quantities developed by Sewall Wright to describe the population structure, defined as any departure from reproduction through random union of gametes. Concepts related to the F-statistics draw from studies of the partitioning of variation, identity coefficients, and diversity measures. Relationships between the first two approaches have recently been clarified and unified. This essay addresses the third pillar of the discussion: Nei's GST and related measures. A hierarchy of probabilities of identity-by-state provides a description of the relationships among levels of a structured population with respect to genetic diversity. Explicit expressions for the identity-by-state probabilities are determined for models of structured populations undergoing regular inbreeding and recurrent mutation. Levels of genetic diversity within and between subpopulations reflect mutation as well as migration. Accordingly, indices of the population structure are inherently locus-specific, contrary to the intentions of Wright. Some implications of this locus-specificity are explored.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenetic VariationModels, GeneticInbreedingMutationeffective numberIBDIBSidentity coefficientsselfing

Identifiers

PMID38696269
PMCPMC11118444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.