ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024
Improving the Prognostic Evaluation Precision of Hospital Outcomes for Heart Failure Using Admission Notes and Clinical Tabular Data: Multimodal Deep Learning Model.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of machine learning algorithms for mortality risk, readmission and phenotype prediction in patients with heart failure: exploring key data sources, input variables and outcomes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- The Liver as a Biomarker Organ in Heart Failure: Molecular Mechanisms, Hepatic Scores and Systemic Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- DETERIO-LLM: enhancing traditional deterioration risk scores with clinical context and advanced reasoning.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with heart failure using an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study based on MIMIC-IV.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Multimodal Deep Learning Based on Ultrasound Images and Clinical Data for Better Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in heart failure.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Leveraging free-text clinical records for heart disease classification through structured feature mapping.PloS one · 2026Article
- A systematic review of multimodal machine learning models for heart failure classification and prognosis prediction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based risk factor analysis and prediction model construction for mortality in chronic heart failure.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Utilizing multimodal artificial intelligence to advance cardiovascular diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based multimodal integration of imaging and clinical data for predicting surgical approach in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Comparison of Multimodal Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting Clinical Deterioration in Ward Patients: Observational Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Interpretable artificial intelligence model for predicting heart failure severity after acute myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Multimodal Visualization and Explainable Machine Learning-Driven Markers Enable Early Identification and Prognosis Prediction for Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Multimodal deep learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients using longitudinal chest X-rays and electronic health records.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Noninvasive Oral Hyperspectral Imaging-Driven Digital Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of novel interpretable survival prediction models based on drug exposures for severe heart failure during vulnerable period.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical notes contain contextualized information beyond structured data related to patients' past and current health status.
objectiveThis study aimed to design a multimodal deep learning approach to improve the evaluation precision of hospital outcomes for heart failure (HF) using admission clinical notes and easily collected tabular data.
methodsData for the development and validation of the multimodal model were retrospectively derived from 3 open-access US databases, including the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III v1.4 (MIMIC-III) and MIMIC-IV v1.0, collected from a teaching hospital from 2001 to 2019, and the eICU Collaborative Research Database v1.2, collected from 208 hospitals from 2014 to 2015. The study cohorts consisted of all patients with critical HF. The clinical notes, including chief complaint, history of present illness, physical examination, medical history, and admission medication, as well as clinical variables recorded in electronic health records, were analyzed. We developed a deep learning mortality prediction model for in-hospital patients, which underwent complete internal, prospective, and external evaluation. The Integrated Gradients and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methods were used to analyze the importance of risk factors.
resultsThe study included 9989 (16.4%) patients in the development set, 2497 (14.1%) patients in the internal validation set, 1896 (18.3%) in the prospective validation set, and 7432 (15%) patients in the external validation set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the models was 0.838 (95% CI 0.827-0.851), 0.849 (95% CI 0.841-0.856), and 0.767 (95% CI 0.762-0.772), for the internal, prospective, and external validation sets, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the multimodal model outperformed that of the unimodal models in all test sets, and tabular data contributed to higher discrimination. The medical history and physical examination were more useful than other factors in early assessments.
conclusionsThe multimodal deep learning model for combining admission notes and clinical tabular data showed promising efficacy as a potentially novel method in evaluating the risk of mortality in patients with HF, providing more accurate and timely decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.