Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696188›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Deep-Learning Based Automated Segmentation and Quantitative Volumetric Analysis of Orbital Muscle and Fat for Diagnosis of Thyroid Eye Disease.

Adham M Alkhadrawi, Lisa Y Lin, Saul A Langarica, Kyungsu Kim, Sierra K Ha, Nahyoung G Lee, Synho Do

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adham M AlkhadrawiDepartment of Radiology, Lab of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Lisa Y LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Saul A LangaricaDepartment of Radiology, Lab of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Kyungsu KimDepartment of Radiology, Lab of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Sierra K HaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Nahyoung G LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Synho DoDepartment of Radiology, Lab of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USKorea University · KRMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is characterized by proliferation of orbital tissues and complicated by compressive optic neuropathy (CON). This study aims to utilize a deep-learning (DL)-based automated segmentation model to segment orbital muscle and fat volumes on computed tomography (CT) images and provide quantitative volumetric data and a machine learning (ML)-based classifier to distinguish between TED and TED with CON. Methods: Subjects with TED who underwent clinical evaluation and orbital CT imaging were included. Patients with clinical features of CON were classified as having severe TED, and those without were classified as having mild TED. Normal subjects were used for controls. A U-Net DL-model was used for automatic segmentation of orbital muscle and fat volumes from orbital CTs, and ensemble of Random Forest Classifiers were used for volumetric analysis of muscle and fat. Results: Two hundred eighty-one subjects were included in this study. Automatic segmentation of orbital tissues was performed. Dice coefficient was recorded to be 0.902 and 0.921 for muscle and fat volumes, respectively. Muscle volumes among normal, mild, and severe TED were found to be statistically different. A classification model utilizing volume data and limited patient data had an accuracy of 0.838 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.929 in predicting normal, mild TED, and severe TED. Conclusions: DL-based automated segmentation of orbital images for patients with TED was found to be accurate and efficient. An ML-based classification model using volumetrics and metadata led to high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing TED and TED with CON. By enabling rapid and precise volumetric assessment, this may be a useful tool in future clinical studies.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDeep LearningGraves OphthalmopathyOculomotor MusclesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrbitOrgan SizeRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID38696188
PMCPMC11077914
OpenAlexW4396658465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.