Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696172›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Grzegorz Raba, Anton Durkech, Tomáš Malík, Doerthe Bassfeld, Philipp Grob, Anahí Hurtado-Chong, Fluomizin Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05788991 (Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vaginally Applied Dequalinium Chloride), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05788991 phase4terminatednot on this map

Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vaginally Applied Dequalinium Chloride (10 mg) and Orally Applied Metronidazole (2 x 500 mg) in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedinova AGRan2021 to 2022Enrolled151ConditionsBacterial Vaginosis, Vaginal Infection, Vaginal DiseasesArmsDequalinium Chloride, Metronidazole Oral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grzegorz RabaPrywatny Gabinet Gynekologiczno, Zurawica, Poland.
Anton DurkechGynedur s.r.o., Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia.
Tomáš MalíkGyneko spol. s.r.o., Vsetin, Czech Republic.
Doerthe BassfeldMedinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp GrobMedinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anahí Hurtado-ChongMedinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fluomizin Study Group
Gemerská Nerudná Spoločnosť (Slovakia) · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal infection. First-line treatments of BV are metronidazole and clindamycin. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance, effective nonantibiotic treatments for BV are needed. Objective: To examine whether dequalinium chloride, a broad-spectrum antiseptic, is noninferior to oral metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 4, multicenter, triple-blind, double-dummy, parallel, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2021, to August 25, 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Participants were premenopausal women 18 years or older with BV from 11 gynecologic practices and 1 hospital in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech. Intervention: Patients were randomized to treatment with dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (10 mg once daily for 6 days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Double-dummy medication kits contained vaginal and oral tablets with placebo and active medication. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the noninferiority margin (of 15 percentage points) in the absolute difference in clinical cure rates between dequalinium chloride and metronidazole 7 to 11 days after start of treatment (visit 1). Noninferiority was met if the lower 95% CI for the difference in clinical cure rate was less than 15 percentage points at visit 1. Results: A total of 147 women (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.0] years) were treated with dequalinium chloride (n = 72) or metronidazole (n = 75). The clinical cure rates at visit 1 were 64 of 69 (92.8%) for dequalinium chloride vs 69 of 74 (93.2%) for metronidazole in the intention-to-treat population, whereas in the per-protocol population, cure rates were 54 of 58 (93.1%) for dequalinium chloride vs 48 of 53 (90.6%) for metronidazole. The treatment differences of -0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -10.8 to 9.8 percentage points; P = .002) in the intention-to-treat population and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 14.4 percentage points; P = .001) in the per-protocol population confirmed the noninferiority of dequalinium chloride. The tolerability of dequalinium chloride was rated as very good by 30 of 50 patients (60.0%) but only by 21 of 54 (38.9%) for metronidazole. Three patients in the metronidazole group suspended treatment due to an adverse event. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial showed that dequalinium chloride was not inferior to metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride had a similarly high cure rate but with better tolerability and fewer adverse events. With a similar efficacy to metronidazole and clindamycin, dequalinium chloride warrants consideration as first-line treatment for BV to help reduce antibiotic consumption. Trial Registration: EudraCT: 2020-002489-15.

Indexed as

DequaliniumMetronidazoleVaginosis, BacterialAdministration, IntravaginalAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDequaliniumMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID38696172
PMCPMC11066704
OpenAlexW4396577539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.