Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696126›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2024

Emerging Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Breast Cancer: Clinical Prioritization of Adverse Events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Sara Cecco, Stefano Puligheddu, Michele Fusaroli, Lorenzo Gerratana, Miao Yan, Claudio Zamagni, Fabrizio De Ponti, Emanuel Raschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara CeccoHospital Pharmacy Unit-CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy. scecco@cro.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0656-7521
Stefano PulighedduDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Michele FusaroliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo GerratanaDepartment of Medical Oncology-CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Miao YanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Claudio ZamagniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Fabrizio De PontiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Emanuel RaschiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are gaining widespread use in the treatment of breast cancer, although toxicity remains an underexplored issue in the real-world clinical setting. Individual case safety reports collected in large pharmacovigilance databases can advance our knowledge on their safety profile in routine clinical practice.

objectiveWe prioritized adverse events (AEs) reported with ADCs approved for breast cancer using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

methodsWe assessed clinical priority of AEs reported in FAERS (February 2013-March 2022) for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) by attributing a score to each AE disproportionally reported with ADCs. Four criteria were assessed: clinical relevance, reporting rate, reported case fatality rate, and stability of disproportionality signals (consistency of the reporting odds ratio across multiple analyses using three different comparators).

resultsWe retained 6589 reports (77.4% referring to T-DM1 as suspect), and 572 AEs generated a disproportionality signal in at least one analysis. The majority of these AEs (62%) were classified as moderate clinical priorities (e.g., interstitial lung disease with T-DXd, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy with T-DM1, febrile neutropenia, and large intestine perforation with SG). Three AEs emerged as high clinical priorities (6 points): septic shock and neutropenic colitis with SG (N = 8 and 13, with median onset 13 and 10 days, respectively), without co-reported immunosuppressive agents; and pulmonary embolism with T-DM1 (N = 31, median onset 109 days, 52% with reported metastasis).

conclusionThe heterogeneous spectrum of post-marketing toxicities for ADCs used in breast cancer, as emerging from the FAERS, is largely in line with preapproval evidence. Although causality cannot be proved, we call for increased awareness by oncologists on potential serious unexpected reactions, including early onset of septic shock and neutropenic colitis with SG, and late emergence of pulmonary embolism with T-DM1.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsImmunoconjugatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansUnited StatesAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID38696126
PMCPMC11111510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.