ArticleJournal of nephrology2024
Clinical and histopathological characteristics of acute kidney injury in a cohort of brain death donors with procurement biopsies.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-Zero Kidney Biopsy and Deceased-Donor Transplant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Value, Prediction, and Clinical Utility.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney biopsies are routinely used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes but their utility in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is limited. We investigated the associations of clinical and histopathological risk factors with ICU-acute kidney injury (AKI) in donors with brain death (DBD) with kidneys of lower quality and procurement biopsies.
methodsOverall, 221 donors with brain death, 239 biopsies and 197 recipients were included. The biopsies were reread and scored according to the Banff recommendations. Clinical and histopathological data were compared between donors with and without AKI defined by serum creatinine and by urine output. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify independent clinical and histopathological risk factors for both phenotypes. Lastly, the impact of each AKI phenotype on outcome was explored. AKI was diagnosed based on the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End-stage kidney disease) AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) or KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria.
resultsAcute kidney injury occurred in 65% of donors based both upon serum creatinine and by urine output. Serum creatinine was able to better discriminate AKI. Multiorgan failure and severe AKI were captured by serum creatinine, and hemodynamic instability by urine output. Donors with serum creatinine-AKI showed lower chronic macrovascular scores, while donors with urine output-AKI had higher chronic microvascular and tubulointerstitial scores. Tubular injury was similar between the subgroups. Except for delayed graft function and one-year death-censored graft survival, the other short-term recipient outcomes were similar for both AKI phenotypes.
conclusionSerum creatinine is more suitable than urine output for defining AKI in donors with brain death. There are distinct clinical risk factors for each AKI-ICU phenotype. Donor AKI phenotype does not predict the recipient´s prognosis. Kidney biopsies do not seem to confer any tangible benefit in defining AKI in donors with brain death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.