Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38696007›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

Strategy for the analysis of lignocellulosic biomass to select a viable transformation route in the Colombian context.

Sara Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Andrés-Felipe Alzate-Ramírez, Stéphanie Baumberger, Laurent Cézard, Mariana Ortiz-Sánchez, Diego Alexander Escobar García, Ana María Zetty Arenas, Konstantinos Moustakas, Carlos Ariel Cardona Alzate

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara Piedrahita-RodríguezDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Instituto de Biotecnología y Agroindustria, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 170003, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Andrés-Felipe Alzate-RamírezDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Instituto de Biotecnología y Agroindustria, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 170003, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Stéphanie BaumbergerInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France.
Laurent CézardInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France.
Mariana Ortiz-SánchezDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Instituto de Biotecnología y Agroindustria, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 170003, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Diego Alexander Escobar GarcíaSede Manizales, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Grupo de Investigación en Movilidad Sostenible (GIMS), Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Campus La Nubia, 170003, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Ana María Zetty ArenasDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Instituto de Biotecnología y Agroindustria, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 170003, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Konstantinos MoustakasUnit of Environmental Science & Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Carlos Ariel Cardona AlzateDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Instituto de Biotecnología y Agroindustria, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 170003, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia. ccardonaal@unal.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4786-3885
Universidad Nacional de Colombia · COAgroParisTech · FRNational Technical University of Athens · GRUniversity of Caldas · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass is widely available in the world. However, a consensus has yet to be established to evaluate the biomass valorization alternatives. The chemical composition is the primary technical limitation in selecting a transformation route to obtain value-added products. In this paper, the bagasse from non-centrifuged sugar (NCS) production and Pinus patula (PP) wood chips were analyzed in terms of complete chemical composition to establish their potential for selecting the transformation routes. A strategy to select the best route based on the chemical composition was applied and a feedstock criteria model was proposed. Schemes were obtained and compared using a bioprocess selection strategy proposed in previous works. As a result, the preliminary biorefinery schemes were finally defined. The assessment of schemes derived from the outlined strategy included technical, economic, environmental, and social analyses. The environmental evaluation was complemented with a geolocation assessment, revealing a 0.75-ton CO

Indexed as

BiomassLigninCelluloseColombiaPinusWoodbagasseCelluloseLigninlignocelluloseAgroindustrial residuesBiorefineriesCriteria modelGeographical studyProcess sustainabilityValorization alternatives

Identifiers

PMID38696007
PMCPMC12696050
OpenAlexW4396588521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.