Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695994›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Technical variety of anastomotic techniques used in proximal gastrectomy with double-tract-reconstruction - a narrative review.

Hai-Peng Tang, He-Xi Zhu, Guo-Peng Lu, Zheng-Qi Peng, Ze-Kai Chen, Meng-Chuan Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hai-Peng TangDepartment of general surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510282, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-9652
He-Xi ZhuDepartment of general surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510282, China.
Guo-Peng LuDepartment of general surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510282, China.
Zheng-Qi PengDepartment of general surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510282, China.
Ze-Kai ChenDepartment of general surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510282, China.
Meng-Chuan WangDepartment of general surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510282, China. dr.mengchuan@outlook.com.
Zhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 40 years, the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer has been gradually increasing worldwide. Currently, surgical resection remains the main radical treatment for early gastric cancer. Due to the rise of functional preservation surgery, proximal gastrectomy has become an alternative to total gastrectomy for surgeons in Japan and South Korea. However, the methods of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy have not been fully unified. At present, the principal methods include esophagogastrostomy, double flap technique, jejunal interposition, and double tract reconstruction. Related studies have shown that double tract reconstruction has a good anti-reflux effect and improves postoperative nutritional prognosis, and it is expected to become a standard digestive tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. However, the optimal anastomoses mode in current double tract reconstruction is still controversial. This article aims to review the current status of double tract reconstruction and address the aforementioned issues.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalGastrectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionHumansJejunumSurgical FlapsDouble tract reconstructionEsophagogastric junction cancerProximal gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID38695994
OpenAlexW4396599786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.