ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2024
Parasite infestation patterns differ between ticks and chigger mites on two rodent host species in Taiwan.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Parasites are typically concentrated on a few host individuals, and identifying the mechanisms underlying aggregated distribution can facilitate a more targeted control of parasites. We investigated the infestation patterns of hard ticks and chigger mites on two rodent species, the striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius, and the lesser ricefield rat, Rattus losea, in Taiwan. We also explored abiotic and biotic factors that were important in explaining variation in the abundance of ticks and chiggers on rodent hosts. Ticks were more aggregated than chiggers on both rodent species. Factors important for the variation in parasitic loads, especially biotic factors, largely differed between ticks and chiggers. Variation partitioning analyses revealed that a larger proportion of variation in chiggers than in ticks can be explained, especially by abiotic factors. If, as proposed, the higher number of parasites in males is due to a larger range area or immunity being suppressed by testosterone, when A. agrarius males host more ticks, they are expected to also host more chiggers, given that chiggers adopt a similar host finding approach to that of ticks. Instead, the similar abundance of chiggers in male and female A. agrarius implies that a large home range or suppressed immunity does not predispose males to inevitably host more parasites. More variations were explained by abiotic than biotic factors, suggesting that controlling practices are more likely to be successful by focusing on factors related to the environment instead of host traits. Our study indicated that the extent of parasitism is rarely determined by a sole factor, but is an outcome of complex interactions among animal physiology, animal behavior, characteristics of parasites, and the environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.