Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695906›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2024

The effects of different types of organisational workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Birgit Aust, Caleb Leduc, Johanna Cresswell-Smith, Clíodhna O'Brien, Reiner Rugulies, Mallorie Leduc, Doireann Ni Dhalaigh, Arilda Dushaj, Naim Fanaj, Daniel Guinart and 12 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Exploring the causes of work-related stress and burnout among doctors in Bangladesh: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Birgit AustNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark. bma@nfa.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-6577
Caleb LeducSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1140-0184
Johanna Cresswell-SmithFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2740-3830
Clíodhna O'BrienNational Suicide Research Foundation, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8105-119X
Reiner RuguliesNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7752-131X
Mallorie LeducNational Suicide Research Foundation, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-4861
Doireann Ni DhalaighNational Suicide Research Foundation, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7636-0043
Arilda DushajCommunity Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-3849
Naim FanajPer Mendje Te Shendoshe (PMSH), Prizren, Kosovo.ORCID 0000-0001-7375-643X
Daniel GuinartCIBERSAM, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5078-6716
Margaret MaxwellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-9500
Hanna ReichGerman Foundation for Depression and Suicide Prevention, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9577-1144
Victoria RossAustralian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6768-1205
Anvar SadathNational Suicide Research Foundation, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1378-5006
Katharina SchnitzspahnEuropean Alliance Against Depression, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6539-8185
Mónika Ditta TóthInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8903-4802
Chantal van AudenhoveKU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5504-5439
Jaap van WeeghelTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-6167
Kristian WahlbeckFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3754-3933
Ella ArensmanSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-1203
Birgit A GreinerSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-6662
MENTUPP consortium members

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 848137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if and which types of organisational interventions conducted in small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) in healthcare are effective on mental health and wellbeing.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched six scientific databases, assessed the methodological quality of eligible studies using QATQS and grouped them into six organisational intervention types for narrative synthesis. Only controlled studies with at least one follow-up were eligible.

resultsWe identified 22 studies (23 articles) mainly conducted in hospitals with 16 studies rated of strong or moderate methodological quality. More than two thirds (68%) of the studies reported improvements in at least one primary outcome (mental wellbeing, burnout, stress, symptoms of depression or anxiety), most consistently in burnout with eleven out of thirteen studies. We found a strong level of evidence for the intervention type "Job and task modifications" and a moderate level of evidence for the types "Flexible work and scheduling" and "Changes in the physical work environment". For all other types, the level of evidence was insufficient. We found no studies conducted with an independent SME, however five studies with SMEs attached to a larger organisational structure. The effectiveness of workplace mental health interventions in these SMEs was mixed.

conclusionOrganisational interventions in healthcare workers can be effective in improving mental health, especially in reducing burnout. Intervention types where the change in the work environment constitutes the intervention had the highest level of evidence. More research is needed for SMEs and for healthcare workers other than hospital-based physicians and nurses.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalHealth PersonnelMental HealthWorkplaceAnxietyDepressionHumansOccupational HealthBurnoutEffectivenessJob stress interventionSmall-to-medium size enterpriseWellbeingWorkplace mental health intervention

Identifiers

PMID38695906
PMCPMC11130054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.