ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Practice patterns of Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand urologists regarding pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer surgery.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT as Single Procedure for Diagnosis and Staging High-Grade Prostate Cancer: A Single Center Experience.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study is to investigate the diagnostic value of
methods115 consecutive men with
resultsConcordance between mpMRI-TB and CB occurred in 76.5% (88/115) of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed that SUVmax (OR= 0.952; 95% CI 0.917-0.988; P= 0.010) and ADCmin (OR= 1.006; 95% CI 1.003-1.010; P= 0.001) were independent risk factors for biopsy concordance. The developed model showed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 0.67, 0.78, 0.81 and 0.78 in the full sample. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram's predicted outcomes closely resembled the ideal curve, indicating consistency between predicted and actual outcomes. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis (DCA) highlighted the clinical net benefit achievable across various risk thresholds. These findings were reinforced by internal validation.
conclusionsThe developed prediction model based on SUVmax and ADCmin showed practical value in guiding the optimization of prostate biopsy pattern. Lower SUVmax and Higher ADCmin values are associated with greater confidence in implementing mono-TB and safely avoiding SB, effectively balancing benefits and risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38695883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.