ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Artificial intelligence improves resident detection of pediatric and young adult upper extremity fractures.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced fracture detection on radiographs with AI assistance for clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted versus independent physician interpretation for bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology experimental · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in virtual fracture clinics: a systematic review of imaging and clinical-text tools.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of the impact of artificial intelligence on educational outcomes in health professions education.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- The implementation of artificial intelligence in upper extremity surgery: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models for detecting wrist and distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Current applications and challenges of artificial intelligence applied to diagnostics in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Improving pediatric hip fracture detection using deep learning: multicenter validation and clinical reader study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Fracture Detection in Orthopedic and Trauma Imaging: Where It Works, Where It Fails, and Principles for Safe Clinical Deployment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimizing the management of periprosthetic infections with artificial intelligence: current evidence and future directions.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Who Is the Surgeon Now: Human Hands or Machine Minds? Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics from Diagnosis to Follow-Up-A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Informed AI Use on Clinical Competence of General Practitioners and Internists: Pre-Post Intervention Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Current Trends and Future Directions in the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Orthopedic Disorders.Cureus · 2026Review
- The use of artificial intelligence in paediatric postgraduate medical education: A scoping review.Paediatrics & child health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Paediatric and Adolescent Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- AI as teacher: effectiveness of an AI-based training module to improve trainee pediatric fracture detection.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of upper extremity trauma radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in predicting injured structures based on clinical images of lacerations in the volar aspect of the hand and forearm.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe wished to evaluate if an open-source artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm ( https://www.childfx.com ) could improve performance of (1) subspecialized musculoskeletal radiologists, (2) radiology residents, and (3) pediatric residents in detecting pediatric and young adult upper extremity fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsA set of evaluation radiographs drawn from throughout the upper extremity (elbow, hand/finger, humerus/shoulder/clavicle, wrist/forearm, and clavicle) from 240 unique patients at a single hospital was constructed (mean age 11.3 years, range 0-22 years, 37.9% female). Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists, three radiology residents, and two pediatric residents were recruited as readers. Each reader interpreted each case initially without and then subsequently 3-4 weeks later with AI assistance and recorded if/where fracture was present.
resultsAccess to AI significantly improved area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of radiology residents (0.768 [0.730-0.806] without AI to 0.876 [0.845-0.908] with AI, P < 0.001) and pediatric residents (0.706 [0.659-0.753] without AI to 0.844 [0.805-0.883] with AI, P < 0.001) in identifying fracture, respectively. There was no evidence of improvement for subspecialized musculoskeletal radiology attendings in identifying fracture (AUC 0.867 [0.832-0.902] to 0.890 [0.856-0.924], P = 0.093). There was no evidence of difference between overall resident AUC with AI and subspecialist AUC without AI (resident with AI 0.863, attending without AI AUC 0.867, P = 0.856). Overall physician radiograph interpretation time was significantly lower with AI (38.9 s with AI vs. 52.1 s without AI, P = 0.030).
conclusionAn openly accessible AI model significantly improved radiology and pediatric resident accuracy in detecting pediatric upper extremity fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.