ArticleMedical physics2024
Curvilinear catheter implantation in HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust optimization of catheter positions and dwell times for HDR prostate brachytherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A Semi-Automated Robotic Platform for Curvilinear Catheter Implantation in HDR Prostate and GYN Brachytherapy.Journal of medical robotics research · 2026Article
- Analysis of Needle Placement Error During Prostate Biopsies in Real Clinical Cases: Effects of Needle Tip Orientation and Target Location.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) has been acknowledged as a widely utilized treatment for patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, despite its side effects such as edema, incontinence, and impotence. Nevertheless, the treatment is consistently limited by the potential danger of excessive irradiation to organs-at-risk (OARs) like the urethra, bladder, and rectum. PURPOSE: This study aims to introduce curvilinear catheter implantation in the prostate gland for HDR treatment. The objective is to improve the radiation dose distribution by offering access channels conformal to the prostate anatomy. This approach seeks to minimize toxicity to nearby OARs while utilizing a reduced number of needles, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes.
methodsCurvilinear catheters were first pre-planned for an anonymized patient using Oncentra treatment planning system (TPS) and hybrid inverse planning optimization (HIPO) algorithm. The trajectories of the catheters were then analyzed using MATLAB to extract their radius of curvature. Tendon-driven active needles were then used to implant curvilinear catheters inside an anthropomorphic phantom.
resultsProposed curvilinear catheter implantation resulted in significant improvement in terms of dosimetric constraints to the OARs and coverage to the prostate. Tendon-driven active needles were shown to be capable of realizing the required pre-planned curvatures inside prostate. It was shown that the active needle can realize a desired radius of curvature and a desired trajectory with an average accuracy of 9.1 ± 8.6 and 1.27 ± 0.50 mm in air and inside a tissue-mimicking phantom, respectively.
conclusionThis work demonstrates the feasibility of using tendon-driven active curvilinear catheter implantation in prostate to improve the outcomes of HDR-BT via improved radiation dose distribution to the prostate and reduced toxicity to the OARs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.