Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695527›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024

Recommendation of mavacamten posology by model-based analyses in adults with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Samira Merali, David H Salinger, Maria Palmisano, Amy J Sehnert, Neelima Thanneer, Hyunmoon Back, Julie D Seroogy, Daniel D Gretler, Amit Roy, Vidya Perera

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03470545 (A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03470545 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten (MYK-461) in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMyoKardia, Inc.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled251ConditionsObstructive Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyArmsmavacamten, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Scoping review of the role of pharmacometrics in model-informed drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Article
  6. Pharmacogenetic testing to broaden patient eligibility for mavacamten.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samira MeraliBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6659-3687
David H SalingerCertara, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Maria PalmisanoBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1518-5688
Amy J SehnertBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1912-1710
Neelima ThanneerBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4398-3865
Hyunmoon BackBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3477-9257
Julie D SeroogyBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Daniel D GretlerDaniel Gretler Consulting, San Francisco, California, USA.
Amit RoyBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-1455
Vidya PereraBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-0123
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USZero to Three · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mavacamten is the first cardiac myosin inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The phase III EXPLORER-HCM (NCT03470545) study used a dose-titration scheme based on mavacamten exposure and echocardiographic assessment of Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient (VLVOTg) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Using population pharmacokinetic/exposure-response modeling and simulations of virtual patients, this in silico study evaluated alternative dose-titration regimens for mavacamten, including regimens that were guided by echocardiographic measures only. Mavacamten exposure-response models for VLVOTg (efficacy) and LVEF (safety) were developed using patient data from five clinical studies and characterized using nonlinear mixed-effects models. Simulations of five echocardiography-guided regimens were performed in virtual cohorts constructed based on either expected or equal population distributions of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) metabolizer phenotypes. Each regimen aimed to maximize the proportions of patients who achieved a VLVOTg below 30 mm Hg while maintaining LVEF above 50% over 40 weeks and 104 weeks, respectively. The exposure-response models successfully characterized mavacamten efficacy and safety parameters. Overall, the simulated regimen with the optimal benefit-risk profile across CYP2C19 phenotypes had steps for down-titration at weeks 4 and 8 (for VLVOTg <20 mm Hg), and up-titration at week 12 (for VLVOTg ≥30 mm Hg and LVEF ≥55%), and every 12 weeks thereafter. This simulation-optimized regimen is recommended in the mavacamten US prescribing information.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicComputer SimulationAdultAgedBenzylaminesClinical Trials as TopicCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Dose-Response Relationship, DrugEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalStroke VolumeUracilBenzylaminesCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19MYK-461Uracil

Identifiers

PMID38695527
PMCPMC11533099
OpenAlexW4396581406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.