Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695476›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2024

Implications of clinical simulation in motivation for learning: scoping review.

Barbara Casarin Henrique-Sanches, Dario Cecilio-Fernandes, Raphael Raniere de Oliveira Costa, Rodrigo Guimarães Dos Santos Almeida, Federico Ferrero Etchegoyen, Alessandra Mazzo

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara Casarin Henrique-SanchesEscola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6531-8250
Dario Cecilio-FernandesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-1680
Raphael Raniere de Oliveira CostaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4199-9696
Rodrigo Guimarães Dos Santos AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-3928
Federico Ferrero EtchegoyenUniversidade Nacional de La Plata, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6680-6443
Alessandra MazzoUniversidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-8939
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify, synthesize, and analyze the scientific knowledge produced regarding the implications of using clinical simulation for undergraduate nursing or medical students' motivation for learning.

methodsThe search for articles was conducted between July 28 and August 3, 2022, on the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. The following was used for the search: P - undergraduate students attending Nursing or Medicine courses; C - motivation for learning, and C - skills and clinical simulation laboratory. The following research question guided the study: "What are the implications of clinical simulation on the motivation for learning of undergraduate students of nursing and medicine?" Of the 1,783 articles found, 13 were included in the sample for analysis. All stages of the selection process were carried out by two independent evaluators. The results were presented as charts and a discursive report.

resultsThe studies analyzed indicated the beneficial effects of clinical simulation on students' motivation, in addition to other gains such as competencies, technical and non-technical skills, knowledge, belonging, autonomy, clinical judgment, critical and reflective thinking, self-efficacy and decreased anxiety, self-management, and improvements in learning and learning climate.

conclusionClinical simulation provides a positive learning environment favorable to the development of technical and interpersonal skills and competencies, and raising the level of motivational qualities.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceLearningMotivationEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalStudents, Nursing

Identifiers

PMID38695476
PMCPMC11081016
OpenAlexW4394773307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.