Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695436›Full record

ArticleCoDAS2024

Towards a better diagnosis of mouth breathing: validity and reliability of a protocol for assessing the awake breathing pattern in preschool children.

Morgane Warnier, Léonor Piron, Dominique Morsomme, Christelle Maillart

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in CoDAS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morgane WarnierDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Research Unit for a life-Course Perspective on Health and Education, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-5674
Léonor PironDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Research Unit for a life-Course Perspective on Health and Education, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0923-452X
Dominique MorsommeDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Research Unit for a life-Course Perspective on Health and Education, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-0498
Christelle MaillartDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Research Unit for a life-Course Perspective on Health and Education, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7091-8293
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Awake Breathing Pattern Assessment (ABPA) is a prototypical clinical grid recently designed through an international consensus of Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) to categorize the awake and habitual breathing pattern during the orofacial myofunctional assessment. This cross-sectional study aims to explore the psychometric properties of the ABPA in a preschool population.

methods133 children from 2;11 to 6 years old were assessed with the ABPA. The percentage of time spent breathing through the mouth was objectively measured by a CO2 sensor and used as a baseline measurement. We first performed a multivariate Latent Profile Analysis based on the CO2 measurement and a parental questionnaire to define the number of categories that best characterize the breathing pattern. Subsequently, we assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency criterion validity, construct validity and sensitivity and specificity.

resultsThe awake breathing pattern can best be described by two groups: nasal and mouth breathing. The ABPA, initially designed in three groups, was adjusted accordingly. This final version showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. There was a significant correlation between the ABPA and the CO2 measurement. The ABPA showed a fair sensitivity and a good specificity.

conclusionThe reference tool based on CO2 data was used in children for the first time and was found to be reliable. The ABPA is a suitable tool for SLPs to confirm the diagnosis of mouth breathing in preschool children if more sensitive screening tools, like parental questionnaires, are used beforehand.

Indexed as

Mouth BreathingCarbon DioxideChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRespirationSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesWakefulnessCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID38695436
PMCPMC11065404
OpenAlexW4396658553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.