Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695256›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2024

Flax fibre reinforced alginate poloxamer hydrogel: assessment of mechanical and 4D printing potential.

Charles de Kergariou, Graham J Day, Adam W Perriman, James P K Armstrong, Fabrizio Scarpa

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles de KergariouBristol Composites Institute, School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering (CADE), University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK. hl18503@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-4047
Graham J DayBiomedical Engineering, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-3728
Adam W PerrimanSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD Bristol, UK.
James P K ArmstrongDepartment of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS1 3NY Bristol, UK.
Fabrizio ScarpaBristol Composites Institute, School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering (CADE), University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK. hl18503@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-4834
University of Bristol · GBAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical and printing performance of a new biomaterial, flax fibre-reinforced alginate-poloxamer based hydrogel, for load-bearing and 4D printing biomedical applications is described in this study. The-self suspendable ability of the material was evaluated by optimising the printing parameters and conducting a collapse test. 1% of the flax fibre weight fraction was sufficient to obtain an optimum hydrogel composite from a mechanical perspective. The collapse test showed that the addition of flax fibres allowed a consistent print without support over longer distances (8 and 10 mm) than the unreinforced hydrogel. The addition of 1% of flax fibres increased the viscosity by 39% and 129% at strain rates of 1 rad s

Identifiers

PMID38695256
PMCPMC11095501
OpenAlexW4396584553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.