Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695208›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2024

Evaluation of the restorative effect of ozone and chitosan-hyaluronic acid with and without mesenchymal stem cells on wound healing in rats.

Mahshid Shabani, Siavash Sharifi, Iraj Karimi, Sadegh Shirian, Milad Fadaei, Esmaeil Mirzaei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahshid ShabaniDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-5527
Siavash SharifiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-5788
Iraj KarimiDepartment of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9371-9943
Sadegh ShirianDepartment of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4137-9056
Milad FadaeiDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-3685
Esmaeil MirzaeiDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0176-5123
Shahrekord University · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of ozone, chitosan-hyaluronic (Cs-HA) acid and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on wound healing in rats. A total of 64 rats were randomly divided into four groups: control, ozone, Cs-HA + ozone and Cs-HA + ozone + MSCs. A 5 mm full-thickness wound was created on the back of each rat. The wound area was measured macroscopically on days 3, 5, 9 and 14. Tissue sections were prepared for histopathological evaluation of inflammation, collagen arrangement, neovascularization and epithelial tissue rearrangement. Macroscopic assessment showed differences in wound area on days 5, 9 and 14. Histopathological examination showed that the Cs-HA + ozone + MSCs and Cs-HA + ozone groups had significantly higher vascularization on day 3 compared to the ozone-treated and control groups. All treatment groups had significantly better collagen arrangement than the control group. On day 5, no significant difference was observed between different groups. On day 9, the inflammation level in the Cs-HA + ozone + MSCs group was significantly lower than in the other groups. All treatment groups had significantly better vascularization compared to the control group. On day 14, the rate of inflammation was significantly lower in the treatment groups than in the control group. Significantly higher collagen arrangement levels were observed in the Cs-HA + ozone and Cs-HA + ozone + MSCs groups compared to the control and ozone groups. All treatment groups had significantly better epithelial tissue rearrangement than the control group. Overall, the results of this study indicated that treatment with ozone, Cs-HA acid, Cs-HA and MSCs accelerated wound healing in rats. The effect of using Cs-HA acid with mesenchymal cells was better than the other types of treatment. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess these factors for improving chronic wound treatment.

Indexed as

ChitosanHyaluronic AcidMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationOzoneWound HealingAnimalsMaleRandom AllocationRatsRats, WistarChitosanHyaluronic AcidOzonechitosanhyaluronic acidmesenchymal stem cellsozonescaffoldwound healing

Identifiers

PMID38695208
PMCPMC11063917
OpenAlexW4396584894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.