Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695174›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2024

Alterations of human CSF and serum-based mitophagy biomarkers in the continuum of Alzheimer disease.

Kateřina Veverová, Jan Laczó, Alžběta Katonová, Hana Horáková, Veronika Matušková, Francesco Angelucci, Martina Laczó, Zuzana Nedelská, Jakub Hort, He-Ling Wang and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A combined artificial intelligence-wet lab approach identifies a pivotal role of the NADAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kateřina VeverováMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5845-1854
Jan LaczóMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alžběta KatonováMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hana HorákováMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Veronika MatuškováMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Francesco AngelucciMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martina LaczóMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana NedelskáMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jakub HortMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
He-Ling WangDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jianying ZhangDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Liu ShiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Evandro Fei FangDepartment of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Martin VyhnálekMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5976-4932
Charles University · CZUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defective mitophagy is consistently found in postmortem brain and iPSC-derived neurons from Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. However, there is a lack of extensive examination of mitophagy status in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the clinical potential of mitophagy biomarkers has not been tested. We quantified biomarkers of mitophagy/autophagy and lysosomal degradation (PINK1, BNIP3L and TFEB) in CSF and serum from 246 individuals, covering mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD,

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersMitophagyAgedAged, 80 and overBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBrainCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPTEN-Induced Putative KinaseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBiomarkersBNIP3L protein, humanMembrane ProteinsProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPTEN-Induced Putative Kinasetau ProteinsTFEB protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsAutophagyBNIP3Lmild cognitive impairmentmitophagyPINK1TFEB

Identifiers

PMID38695174
PMCPMC11262225
OpenAlexW4396598066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.