Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38695016›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Non-invasive prediction of preeclampsia using the maternal plasma cell-free DNA profile and clinical risk factors.

Yan Yu, Wenqiu Xu, Sufen Zhang, Suihua Feng, Feng Feng, Junshang Dai, Xiao Zhang, Peirun Tian, Shunyao Wang, Zhiguang Zhao and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in cfDNA research for pregnancy-related diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Yan Yu *Department of Obstetrics, Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Wenqiu Xu *BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Sufen Zhang *Department of Clinical Laboratory (Institute of Medical Genetics), Zhuhai Center for Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai, China.
Suihua Feng *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Feng Feng *BGI-Tianjin, BGI-Shenzhen, Tianjin, China.
Junshang Dai *The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao ZhangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Peirun TianBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Shunyao WangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhiguang ZhaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Wenrui ZhaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Liping GuanBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhixu QiuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jianguo ZhangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Huanhuan PengBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jiawei LinBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Qun ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Weiping ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Huahua LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Qiang ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Gefei XiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory (Institute of Medical Genetics), Zhuhai Center for Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai, China.
Zhongzhe LiDepartment of Prevention and Health Care, Zhuhai Center for Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai, China.
Shihao ZhouDepartment of Genetics and Eugenics, Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, China.
Can PengDepartment of Genetics and Eugenics, Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, China.
Zhen XuDepartment of Genetics and Eugenics, Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, China.
Jingjing ZhangHospital Office, Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaohong HeDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Hua LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory (Institute of Medical Genetics), Zhuhai Center for Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai, China.
Jia LiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaohong RuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Lijian ZhaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jun HeDepartment of Genetics and Eugenics, Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy complication defined by new onset hypertension and proteinuria or other maternal organ damage after 20 weeks of gestation. Although non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities during pregnancy, its performance in combination with maternal risk factors to screen for PE has not been extensively validated. Our aim was to develop and validate classifiers that predict early- or late-onset PE using the maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profile and clinical risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed NIPT data of 2,727 pregnant women aged 24-45 years from four hospitals in China, which had previously been used to screen for fetal aneuploidy at 12 + 0 ~ 22 + 6 weeks of gestation. According to the diagnostic criteria for PE and the time of diagnosis (34 weeks of gestation), a total of 143 early-, 580 late-onset PE samples and 2,004 healthy controls were included. The wilcoxon rank sum test was used to identify the cfDNA profile for PE prediction. The Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables of clinical risk factors between PE samples and healthy controls, respectively. Machine learning methods were performed to develop and validate PE classifiers based on the cfDNA profile and clinical risk factors. Results: By using NIPT data to analyze cfDNA coverages in promoter regions, we found the cfDNA profile, which was differential cfDNA coverages in gene promoter regions between PE and healthy controls, could be used to predict early- and late-onset PE. Maternal age, body mass index, parity, past medical histories and method of conception were significantly differential between PE and healthy pregnant women. With a false positive rate of 10%, the classifiers based on the combination of the cfDNA profile and clinical risk factors predicted early- and late-onset PE in four datasets with an average accuracy of 89 and 80% and an average sensitivity of 63 and 48%, respectively. Conclusion: Incorporating cfDNA profiles in classifiers might reduce performance variations in PE models based only on clinical risk factors, potentially expanding the application of NIPT in PE screening in the future.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAin vitro fertilizationnon-invasive prenatal testingpredictionpreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID38695016
PMCPMC11061442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.