Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694964›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences

A Cross-sectional Survey-based Study of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Towards Uses of Cosmetics and Cosmetovigilance in India.

Almass Siddiqui, Nida Ali, Arushi Pandey, Mohammad Daud Ali, Nafis Haider, Mohammed Zaafar Khan, Zeenat Iqbal, Mohd Aamir Mirza, Sitah Alharthi, Md Salahuddin Ansari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Almass SiddiquiSchool of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Nida AliDepartment of Public Health, Allied Health Sciences and Management, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, India.
Arushi PandeyDepartment of Management Studies, Amity Business School, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mohammad Daud AliDepartment of Pharmacy, Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences, Abdulrazaq Bin Hammam Street, Al Safa, Dammam 34222, Saudi Arabia.
Nafis HaiderBasic Medical Sciences Unit, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Zaafar KhanSchool of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Zeenat IqbalDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard. New Delhi, India.
Mohd Aamir MirzaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard. New Delhi, India.
Sitah AlharthiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Al-Dawadmi Campus, Al-Dawadmi, 11961, Saudi Arabia.
Md Salahuddin AnsariDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy AlDawadmi, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia.
Gulam MustafaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Al-Dawadmi Campus, Al-Dawadmi, 11961, Saudi Arabia.
Sarfaraz AhmadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice Research Unit (PPRU), College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In India, the cosmetics industry has expanded significantly because of changing lifestyles and increased awareness. In terms of earning the most money from the personal care and cosmetics industry in 2021, India is ranked fourth globally. Many cosmetics sold in India include ingredients that cannot be used on humans. Objective: To assess knowledge, attitudes, and practice toward the uses of cosmetics and cosmetovigilance in India. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, from April to May 2022, among the general population living in the Delhi NCR region, India. Study questionnaires (printed and survey link) were distributed in public as well as at workplaces for the survey. Results: Around 268 (54.78%) females and 223 (45.21%) males participated in the survey. Amongst the total respondents - 407 (83%) agreed that they are using cosmetic products on a daily basis, females 229 (85.44%), being the majority users compared to males 178 (80%), with a significant Conclusion: Because of the right safety and effectiveness mentorship of cosmetics, regulatory agencies and stakeholders should adopt this broadly. Cosmetovigilance needs to be put into practice.

Indexed as

Cosmetics itemscosmetovigilanceIndiaside-effects

Identifiers

PMID38694964
PMCPMC11060625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.