Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694954›Full record

Reviewnpj climate action2023

Harnessing human and machine intelligence for planetary-level climate action.

Ramit Debnath, Felix Creutzig, Benjamin K Sovacool, Emily Shuckburgh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj climate action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Ramit DebnathCambridge Zero and Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FD United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0727-5683
Felix CreutzigMercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, 10829 Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-3348
Benjamin K SovacoolCenter for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4794-9403
Emily ShuckburghCambridge Zero and Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FD United Kingdom.
Boston University · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USMercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing global race for bigger and better artificial intelligence (AI) systems is expected to have a profound societal and environmental impact by altering job markets, disrupting business models, and enabling new governance and societal welfare structures that can affect global consensus for climate action pathways. However, the current AI systems are trained on biased datasets that could destabilize political agencies impacting climate change mitigation and adaptation decisions and compromise social stability, potentially leading to societal tipping events. Thus, the appropriate design of a less biased AI system that reflects both direct and indirect effects on societies and planetary challenges is a question of paramount importance. In this paper, we tackle the question of data-centric knowledge generation for climate action in ways that minimize biased AI. We argue for the need to co-align a less biased AI with an epistemic web on planetary health challenges for more trustworthy decision-making. A human-in-the-loop AI can be designed to align with three goals. First, it can contribute to a planetary epistemic web that supports climate action. Second, it can directly enable mitigation and adaptation interventions through knowledge of social tipping elements. Finally, it can reduce the data injustices associated with AI pretraining datasets.

Indexed as

Climate-change adaptationEngineering

Identifiers

PMID38694954
PMCPMC11062317
OpenAlexW4385954435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.