Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694948›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Utilization of Point-of-Care Ultrasound as an Imaging Modality in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Apurva Popat, Samyuktha Harikrishnan, Niran Seby, Udvas Sen, Sagar K Patel, Lakshay Mittal, Mitkumar Patel, Charitha Vundi, Yashasvi Patel, Babita and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use in Cardiac Arrest Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An Academic Family Physician's Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Experience.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Apurva PopatInternal Medicine, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, USA.
Samyuktha HarikrishnanInternal Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, ARE.
Niran SebyInternal Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, GEO.
Udvas SenInternal Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala, IND.
Sagar K PatelInternal Medicine, Gujarat Adani Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhuj, IND.
Lakshay MittalInternal Medicine, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, IND.
Mitkumar PatelInternal Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Mission (MGM) Medical College, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Charitha VundiInternal Medicine, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Amalapuram, IND.
Yashasvi PatelInternal Medicine, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
BabitaInternal Medicine, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, UKR.
Ashish KumarGeneral Practice, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND.
Akash A NakraniInternal Medicine, Gujarat Adani Institute of Medical Sciences, Surat, IND.
Mahir PatelMedical School, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Sweta YadavInternal Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND.
Adani Institute of Infrastructure Engineering · INMarshfield Clinic · USMedical Research Foundation · GBPandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an imaging modality that has become a fundamental part of clinical care provided in the emergency department (ED). The applications of this tool in the ED have ranged from resuscitation, diagnosis, and therapeutic to procedure guidance. This review aims to summarize the evidence on the use of POCUS for diagnosis and procedure guidance. To achieve this, CrossRef, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were extensively searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2023. Additionally, the risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (for studies on the diagnostic role of POCUS) and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (for studies on the use of POCUS for procedure guidance). Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy outcomes were pooled using STATA 16 software (StatCorp., College Station, TX, USA), while outcomes related to procedure guidance were pooled using the Review Manager software. The study included 81 articles (74 evaluating the diagnostic application of POCUS and seven evaluating the use of POCUS in guiding clinical procedures). In our findings sensitivities and specificities for various conditions were as follows: appendicitis, 65% and 89%; hydronephrosis, 82% and 74%; small bowel obstruction, 93% and 82%; cholecystitis, 75% and 96%; retinal detachment, 94% and 91%; abscess, 95% and 85%; foreign bodies, 67% and 97%; clavicle fractures, 93% and 94%; distal forearm fractures, 97% and 94%; metacarpal fractures, 94% and 92%; skull fractures, 91% and 97%; and pleural effusion, 91% and 97%. A subgroup analysis of data from 11 studies also showed that the two-point POCUS has a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 96%, while the three-point POCUS is 87% sensitive and 92% specific in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. In addition, the analyses showed that ultrasound guidance significantly increases the overall success rate of peripheral venous access (p = 0.02) and significantly reduces the number of skin punctures (p = 0.01) compared to conventional methods. In conclusion, POCUS can be used in the ED to diagnose a wide range of clinical conditions accurately. Furthermore, it can be used to guide peripheral venous access and central venous catheter insertion.

Indexed as

clinical procedure assistancediagnostic ultrasound applicationsemergency department diagnosticsemergency medical technologypocus diagnostic accuracypocus efficiency studiespocus in emergency medicineprocedure guidance ultrasoundradiological imaging techniquesultrasound in clinical care

Identifiers

PMID38694948
PMCPMC11062642
OpenAlexW4390910578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.