ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024
Are TomoFix Locking Plates Really Anatomical for Indian Population?
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes of double-triangle locking compression plate (DT-LCP) versus T-shaped locking compression plate (T-LCP) in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a follow-up study of over 5 years.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The use of a TomoFix plate can be a challenge in Asian population who inherently have smaller tibial bones. This study aims to find out the normal proximal tibial morphometric measurements in Indian population and to compare the Medial Anterior Radius of Curvature (MAROC) of proximal tibia with the Proximal Part Radius of Curvature (PPROC) of the available TomoFix plates, to estimate conformity of the fit between them. Methods: Retrospective Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based proximal tibial measurements were performed on 824 knees, 664 females and 160 males (604 patients). The mean MAROC, mean MAROC in males and mean MAROC in females were compared to the PPROC of TomoFix plates. Results: The radiological measurements revealed a mean AP length of 45.22 ± 3.79 mm, mean ML width of 69.04 ± 5.01 mm and mean MAROC of 21.88 ± 2.11 mm. The mean MAROC in males was 24.07 ± 2.1 mm, whereas in females it was 21.35 ± 1.75 mm. The mean MAROC, mean MAROC in males and mean MAROC in females when compared to the PPROC of Standard TomoFix plate (38 mm), Small TomoFix and Anatomical TomoFix plates (30 mm) showed a significant difference ( Conclusion: The TomoFix plates, including Small (Asian Version) and Anatomical plates, are relatively large for the Indian population. Our study may help the implant to designers develop a plate that will better suit the Indian population, improving results and reducing hardware-related complications of MOWHTO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.