Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694696›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2024

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithms in Automated Detection of Neck of Femur Fracture on a Plain Radiograph: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Manish Raj, Arshad Ayub, Arup Kumar Pal, Jitesh Pradhan, Naushad Varish, Sumit Kumar, Seshadri Reddy Varikasuvu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Manish RajDepartment of Orthopaedic, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-4611-4324
Arshad AyubDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-0062
Arup Kumar PalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand India.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-0715
Jitesh PradhanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT), Jamshedpur, Jharkhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-6264-4093
Naushad VarishDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, GITAM University, Hyderabad Campus, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0088-2213
Sumit KumarInformatics Cluster, School of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-2901-8218
Seshadri Reddy VarikasuvuDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-2230-4676
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar · INGITAM University · INIndian Institute of Technology Dhanbad · INNational Institute of Technology Jamshedpur · INUniversity of Petroleum and Energy Studies · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based algorithms in identifying neck of femur fracture on a plain radiograph. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, IEEE, and the Science direct databases were searched from inception to 30 July 2023. Eligibility criteria for study selection: Eligible article types were descriptive, analytical, or trial studies published in the English language providing data on the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithms in the detection of the neck of the femur (NOF) fracture on plain X-ray. Main outcome measures: The prespecified primary outcome was to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden index, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Two teams of reviewers (each consisting of two members) extracted the data from available information in each study. The risk of bias was assessed using a mix of the CLAIM (the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging) and QUADAS-2 (A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria. Results: Of the 437 articles retrieved, five were eligible for inclusion, and the pooled sensitivity of AIs in diagnosing the fracture NOF was 85%, with a specificity of 87%. For all studies, the pooled Youden index (YI) was 0.73. The average positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 19.88, whereas the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.17. The random effects model showed an overall odds of 1.16 (0.84-1.61) in the forest plot, comparing the AI system with those of human diagnosis. The overall heterogeneity of the studies was marginal (I Conclusion: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms can be used as a diagnostic adjunct, benefiting clinicians by taking less time and effort in neck of the femur (NOF) fracture diagnosis. Study registration: PROSPERO CRD42022375449. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01130-6.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFracture detectionNeck of femurPlain radiograph

Identifiers

PMID38694696
PMCPMC11058182
OpenAlexW4394579025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.