Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694692›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024

A Multi-Element Identification System Based on Deep Learning for the Visual Field of Percutaneous Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

Jinhui Bu, Yan Lei, Yari Wang, Jiaqi Zhao, Sen Huang, Jun Liang, Zhenfei Wang, Long Xu, Bo He, Minghui Dong and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Benchmarking deep learning pipelines for surgical instrument segmentation in endoscopic spine surgery: cross-dataset evaluation under deployment-realistic conditions.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jinhui Bu *Affiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Yan Lei *Affiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Yari Wang *School of Computer Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116 China.
Jiaqi ZhaoSchool of Computer Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116 China.
Sen HuangAffiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Jun LiangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Southeast University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Zhenfei WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Southeast University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Long XuBengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233000 China.
Bo HeAffiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Minghui DongAffiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Guangpu LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Southeast University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Ru NiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Southeast University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Chao MaAffiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Guangwang LiuAffiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221009 China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNNanjing Medical University · CNChina University of Mining and Technology · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNBengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc herniation is a common degenerative lumbar disease with an increasing incidence. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy can treat lumbar disc herniation safely and effectively with a minimally invasive procedure. However, the learning curve of this technology is steep, which means that initial learners are often not sufficiently proficient in endoscopic operations, which can easily lead to iatrogenic damage. At present, the application of computer deep learning technology to clinical diagnosis, treatment, and surgical navigation has achieved satisfactory results. Purpose: The objective of our team is to develop a multi-element identification system for the visual field of endoscopic spine surgery using deep learning algorithms and to evaluate the feasibility of this system. Method: We established an image database by collecting surgical videos of 48 patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation, which was labeled by two spinal surgeons. We selected 6000 images of the visual field of percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery (including various tissue structures and surgical instruments), divided into the training data, validation data, and test data according to 2:1:2. We developed convolutional neural network models based on instance segmentation-Solov2, CondInst, Mask R-CNN and Yolact, and set the four network model backbone as ResNet101 and ResNet50 respectively. Mean average precision (mAP) and frames per second (FPS) were used to measure the performance of each model for classification, localization and recognition in real time, and AP (average) is used to evaluate how easily an element is detected by neural networks based on computer deep learning. Result: Comprehensively comparing mAP and FSP of each model for bounding box test and segmentation task for the test set of images, we found that Solov2 (ResNet101) (mAP = 73.5%, FPS = 28.9), Mask R-CNN (ResNet101) (mAP = 72.8%, FPS = 28.5) models are the most stable, with higher precision and faster image processing speed. Combining the average precision of the elements in the bounding box test and segmentation tasks in each network, the AP(average) was highest for tool 3 (bbox-0.85, segm-0.89) and lowest for tool 5 (bbox-0.63, segm-0.72) in the instrumentation, whereas in the anatomical tissue elements, the fibrosus annulus (bbox-0.68, segm-0.69) and ligamentum flavum (bbox-0.65, segm-0.62) had higher AP(average),while extra-dural fat (bbox-0.42, segm-0.44) was lowest. Conclusion: Our team has developed a multi-element identification system for the visual field of percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery adapted to the interlaminar and foraminal approaches, which can identify and track anatomical tissue (nerve, ligamentum flavum, nucleus pulposus, etc.) and surgical instruments (endoscopic forceps, an high-speed diamond burr, etc.), which can be used in the future as a virtual educational tool or applied to the intraoperative real-time assistance system for spinal endoscopic operation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningLumbar disc herniationPELDSpinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38694692
PMCPMC11058141
OpenAlexW4394685379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.