Cutting Edge Developments in Spine Surgery at the University of Missouri.

Ravi Nunna, Farzana Tariq, Michael Ortiz, Inamullah Khan, Sabrina Genovese, Paul Santiago

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravi NunnaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Farzana TariqDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Michael OrtizDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Inamullah KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Sabrina GenoveseSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Paul SantiagoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of spinal pathologies has evolved significantly from the times of Hippocrates and Galen to the current era. This evolution has led to the development of cutting-edge technologies to improve surgical techniques and patient outcomes. The University of Missouri Health System is a high-volume, tertiary care academic medical center that serves a large catchment area in central Missouri and beyond. The Department of Neurosurgery has sought to integrate the best available technologies to serve their spine patients. These technological advancements include intra-operative image guidance, robotic spine surgery, minimally invasive techniques, motion preservation surgery, and interdisciplinary care of metastatic disease to the spine. These advances have resulted in safer surgeries with enhanced outcomes at the University of Missouri. This integration of innovation demonstrates our tireless commitment to ensuring excellence in the comprehensive care of a diverse range of patients with complex spinal pathologies.

Indexed as

Spinal DiseasesAcademic Medical CentersHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMissouriNeurosurgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpine

Identifiers

PMID38694605

PMCPMC11057865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.