Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694539›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for focal liver lesions in patients with a history of multiple primary malignant neoplasms.

Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuichi TakanoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6803-9460
Naoki TamaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Masataka YamawakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Jun NodaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Tetsushi AzamiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Fumitaka NiiyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2248-8655
Fumiya NishimotoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Naotaka MaruokaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Tatsuya YamagamiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Masatsugu NagahamaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for diagnosing focal liver lesions in patients with a history of multiple primary malignant neoplasms. Methods: Among patients who underwent EUS-TA for focal liver lesions between 2016 and 2022, those with a history of multiple malignant neoplasms were included. A histologically confirmed malignant tumor within the past 5 years before EUS-TA was defined as a history of malignant neoplasm. The primary outcomes were diagnostic ability and adverse events of EUS-TA. Results: This study included 16 patients (median age, 73 [33-90] years), the median tumor size was 32 (6-51) mm, 14 had a history of double malignant neoplasms, whereas two had triple malignant neoplasms. Malignant neoplasms were detected histologically or cytologically in all cases. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 75% (12/16), and the final diagnosis of EUS-TA was metastatic liver tumor in 12 patients, and primary malignant liver tumor in four patients. The primary site could be identified in 11 of 12 metastatic tumor cases. The diagnostic yield of EUS-TA was 100% (16/16) for differentiating benign and malignant tumors and 94% (15/16) for confirming the histological type including the primary site of metastatic lesions. No adverse events were associated with the procedure. Conclusion: EUS-TA is a useful diagnostic modality for focal liver lesions in patients with a history of multiple malignant neoplasms, allowing for the differential diagnosis of primary and metastatic tumors and identification of the primary site of metastatic lesions.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundfocal liver lesionhepatocellular carcinomametastatic liver tumortissue acquisition

Identifiers

PMID38694539
PMCPMC11058681
OpenAlexW4396519125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.