ArticleAJOG global reports2024
Aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in low- and middle-income countries: mind the gaps.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Model Development on Adherence to Aspirin in Pregnancy: A Co-Produced Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Pooled it
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: a review of antenatal interventions to improve maternal outcomes.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of Low-Dose Aspirin on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Investigating the association of albuminuria with the incidence of preeclampsia and its predictive capabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Glycoside fraction from pear seed functionally antagonizes sFLT-1 and restores angiogenic signaling in preeclampsia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Impact of low-dose aspirin on maternal haemoglobin levels during pregnancy: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- An interventional pilot study protocol on the effect of extra virgin olive oil on women with preeclampsia risk.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Maternal obesity shapes associations between preeclampsia and birthweight in pregnancies exposed to low-dose aspirin.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- HELLP syndrome as a major contributor to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among preeclamptic women: findings from a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- First-trimester screening for preeclampsia between 11 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Formative research to optimize pre-eclampsia risk-screening and prevention (PEARLS): study protocol.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Low adherence to aspirin and calcium carbonate for preeclampsia prevention in pregnant women with chronic hypertension in a brazilian hospital.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a syndrome that continues to be a major contributor to maternal and neonatal mortality, especially in low-income countries. Low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia, but the mechanism is still unknown. Risk factors to identify women at risk of preeclampsia are based on clinical characteristics. Women identified as high-risk would benefit from aspirin treatment initiated, preferably at the end of the first trimester. Current efforts have largely focused on developing screening algorithms that incorporate clinical risk factors, maternal biomarkers, and uterine artery Doppler evaluated in the first trimester. However, most studies on preeclampsia are conducted in high-income settings, raising uncertainties about whether the information gained can be totally applied in low-resource settings. In low- and middle-income countries, lack of adequate antenatal care and late commencement of antenatal care visits pose significant challenges for both screening for preeclampsia and initiating aspirin treatment. Furthermore, the preventive effect of first-trimester screening based on algorithms and subsequent aspirin treatment is primarily seen for preterm preeclampsia, and reviews indicate minimal or no impact on reducing the risk of term preeclampsia. The lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing term preeclampsia is a crucial concern, as 75% of women will develop this subtype of the syndrome. Regarding adverse outcomes, low-dose aspirin has been linked to a possible higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage, a condition as deadly as preeclampsia in many low- and middle-income countries. The increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage among women in low-income settings should be taken into consideration when discussing which pregnant women would benefit from the use of aspirin and the ideal aspirin dosage for preventing preeclampsia. In addition, women's adherence to aspirin during pregnancy is crucial for determining its effectiveness and complications, an aspect often overlooked in trials. In this review, we analyze the knowledge gaps that must be addressed to safely increase low-dose aspirin use in low- and middle-income countries, and we propose directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.