Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694401›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

The comparison of hot and cold executive functions in patients with bipolar II disorder, borderline personality disorder, and healthy individuals.

Ayyub Sabbah, Shekoofeh Mottaghi, Parviz Ghaedi, Melika Ghalandari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayyub SabbahDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan. Iran.
Shekoofeh MottaghiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan. Iran.
Parviz GhaediDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan. Iran.
Melika GhalandariDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of graduate school, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Differential diagnosis of bipolar II disorder (BD-II) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) has always been challenging for clinicians due to symptoms' overlap. This study aimed to compare hot and cold executive functions (EFs) in BD-II patients, as well as BPD and healthy controls (HCs), in order to differentiate these two disorders. Methods: In the present study, 30 BD-II and 30 BPD patients undergoing the drug therapy with mood stabilizers, and 30 HC were examined using EFs evaluated tests. The data were then analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Results: The BD-II Patients performed significantly less in all cold EFs than the HC. Also, BPD patients had meaningfully lesser performance compared to HC in all cold EFs except sustained attention. No significant difference was perceived between the two patient groups in the cold EFs. In BD-II patients, the risky decision-making as a hot EFs' component was not significantly different from HC; nevertheless, its amount was significantly higher in BPD than in the HC and BD-II patients. Conclusion: These findings underline the differences between the two mentioned disorders based on the hot EFs, which may indicate further disorder in the emotional information processing system among the BPD patients.

Indexed as

bipolar II disorderborderline personality disordercold executive functionshot executive functions

Identifiers

PMID38694401
PMCPMC11060245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.