Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694362›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Probiotic formulations and gastro-intestinal diseases in the paediatric population: a narrative review.

Amna Siddiqui, Ramsha Haider, Syeda Ilsa Aaqil, Laiba Imran Vohra, Khulud Qamar, Areesha Jawed, Nabeela Fatima, Alishba Adnan, Vidhi Parikh, Sidhant Ochani and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Amna SiddiquiDepartment of Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College.
Ramsha HaiderDepartment of Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College.
Syeda Ilsa AaqilDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University.
Laiba Imran VohraDepartment of Medicine, Ziauddin Medical University.
Khulud QamarDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health and Sciences, Karachi.
Areesha JawedDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health and Sciences, Karachi.
Nabeela FatimaMentor, International Society of Chronic Illnesses, India.
Alishba AdnanDepartment of Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College.
Vidhi ParikhParul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara.
Sidhant OchaniDepartment of Medicine, Khairpur Medical College, Khairpur Mir's, Pakistan.
Md Al HasibuzzamanInstitute of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-4836
Karachi Medical and Dental College · PKDow University of Health Sciences · PKInstitute of Medical Sciences · INJinnah Sindh Medical University · PKUniversity of Dhaka · BDZiauddin University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: Probiotics are live microbial supplements that improve the microbial balance in the host animal when administered in adequate amounts. They play an important role in relieving symptoms of many diseases associated with gastrointestinal tract, for example, in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), antibiotic-associated diarrhea, relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis, Helicobacter pylori infections, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this narrative review, the authors aim to evaluate the role of different probiotic formulations in treating gastrointestinal diseases in pediatric population aged 18 years or younger and highlight the main considerations for selecting probiotic formulations for use in this population. Methodology: The authors searched PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 24th July 2022, without any restrictions. Using an iterative process, the authors subsequently added papers through hand-searching citations contained within retrieved articles and relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Results: The effectiveness of single-organism and composite probiotics in treating gastrointestinal disorders in pediatric patients aged 18 or under were analyzed and compared in this study. A total of 39 studies were reviewed and categorized based on positive and negative outcomes, and compared with a placebo, resulting in 25 studies for single-organism and 14 studies for composite probiotics. Gastrointestinal disorders studied included NEC, acute gastroenteritis (AGE), Acute Diarrhea, Ulcerative Colitis (UC), and others. The results show that probiotics are effective in treating various gastrointestinal disorders in children under 18, with single-organism probiotics demonstrating significant positive outcomes in most studies, and composite probiotics showing positive outcomes in all studies analyzed, with a low incidence of negative outcomes for both types. Conclusion: This study concludes that single-organism and composite probiotics are effective complementary therapies for treating gastrointestinal disorders in the pediatric population. Hence, healthcare professionals should consider using probiotics in standard treatment regimens, and educating guardians can enhance the benefits of probiotic therapy. Further research is recommended to identify the optimal strains and dosages for specific conditions and demographics. The integration of probiotics in clinical practice and ongoing research can contribute to reducing the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal disorders in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

adolescentchildrengutmicrobiome signaturemicrobiotasynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID38694362
PMCPMC11060255
OpenAlexW4393972413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.