Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694336›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Efficacy of modified Alvarado score combined with ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective analytical study.

Santosh Sirpaili, Lilamani Rajthala, Sabin Banmala, Pratima Gautam, Sangita Ranabhat, Sangita Raj Ghatani, Eruka Shrestha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Santosh SirpailiDepartment of Surgery, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan.
Lilamani RajthalaDepartment of Surgery, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan.
Sabin BanmalaDepartment of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Sindhuli Hospital, Sindhuli.
Pratima GautamDepartment of Surgery, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan.
Sangita RanabhatDepartment of Surgery, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan.
Sangita Raj GhataniNobel College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Eruka ShresthaOchsner Medical Center, West Bank, New Orleans, LA.
Patan Academy of Health Sciences · NPNobel Academy · NPOchsner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency encountered in the emergency department, and diagnosis is difficult at times. Imaging and various clinical scoring are present to aid in the diagnosis. Ultrasound is an easily accessible modality and can accomplish more than a computed tomography (CT) scan at times. Modified Alvarado score (MAS) includes parameters that do not pose an extra financial burden to the patient. Combining both the imaging and clinical scoring systems, the authors decided to evaluate the combined MAS for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: This is a prospective analytical study conducted in a tertiary hospital for one and a half years. Fifty-five patients with right lower quadrant pain were enroled, and evaluated along with an ultrasound. MAS and combined MAS were obtained, and the results of the histopathological examination were compared. Results: Out of 55 clinically diagnosed cases who underwent an emergency appendectomy, 27 were males and 28 were females. Of these, 50 cases had acute appendicitis as per histopathological examination. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the MAS was 42%, 100%, 100%, 20.8%, 47.27%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of the USG were 84%, 40%, 93.3%, 20%, and 80%, respectively. Combining both the scores, the Combined MAS had the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 98.18%, 0%, 90.7%, 0%, and 89.09%, respectively. Conclusion: As the combination of USG has raised the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the MAS, it can be an alternative to CT/MRI imaging for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in resource-limited settings. This score requires further studies to validate with a larger sample size.

Indexed as

appendicitiscombined MASmodified Alvarado scoreultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38694336
PMCPMC11060244
OpenAlexW4392657919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.