ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Evaluation of the efficacy of the Z-plasty surgical technique vs. secondary wound healing mechanism in the treatment of the pilonidal sinus: a clinical trial.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probe-Guided Core Excision for Complete Sinus Tract Removal in Pilonidal Disease.Annals of dermatology · 2026Article
- Future of pilonidal cyst surgery: a comparative review of traditional and laser techniques.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Pilot Study: Application of Lateralized Z-plasty in Pilonidal Sinus Defect Closure.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The most important step in treating a pilonidal sinus is eradication by surgical excision. Over the years, various surgical techniques have been reported for wound closure, yet their management still poses a challenge. The current study compares the results of two different methods of wound management: secondary wound healing versus the Z-plasty surgical technique. Material and method: The current clinical trial recruited 84 uncomplicated pilonidal sinus patients who were to undergo complete surgical excision of the pilonidal sinus. For wound healing, the 84 subjects were equally divided into two groups of 42 patients each. One group was selected for Z-plasty surgical wound closure and the other for the secondary healing mechanism. Outcomes measured consisted of demographic data, length of operation, complications, severity of pain, number of dressings, recurrence, and complete healing time. Result: Age or sex distribution and the median BMI (kg/m²) did not significantly differ between the two groups. The length of the operation for Z-plasty subjects was significantly longer ( Conclusion: Z-plasty is a safe and effective procedure in terms of wound complications and recurrence rate. This method is also cost-effective and better received by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.