Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694309›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

A rare case of retained metallic foreign body in liver: case report and review of literature.

Santosh Dev, Manish Yadav, Newton Ashish Shah, Barsha Dev, Shishir Devkota, Laxman Khadka, Dhiraj Kumar Das, Samridhi Yadav, Jayant Kumar Sah, Bikal Ghimire

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hepatic abscess caused by foreign body ingestion: A case report.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Santosh DevTribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine.
Manish YadavTribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine.
Newton Ashish ShahTribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine.
Barsha DevNepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur.
Shishir DevkotaTribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine.
Laxman KhadkaTribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine.
Dhiraj Kumar DasUniversal College of Medical Sciences, Siddharthanagar.
Samridhi YadavNational Medical College, Birgunj, Nepal.
Jayant Kumar SahTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu.
Bikal GhimireTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu.
Tribhuvan University · NPNepal Medical College Teaching Hospital · NPTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NPUniversal College · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Foreign bodies in the liver are uncommon but can lead to severe conditions like liver abscess and sepsis. They typically enter through direct penetration, migration from the gastrointestinal tract, or through the blood. Common foreign objects include metal pins, or sewing needles swallowed accidentally. Case presentation: A 25-year-old male presented to our OPD with pain over the right abdomen with a prior history of projectile injury causing laceration over the right anterior abdomen with primary suturing. On radiological investigation, a retained foreign body was revealed. The metallic foreign body was embedded in the liver for 5 months. Removal of the foreign body was performed without any complications. Clinical discussion: Intrahepatic foreign bodies (FBs) in the liver can result from penetrating injuries, iatrogenic causes, or ingestion, particularly in children. Clinical presentations vary, and complications such as abscess formation may occur. Diagnosis involves imaging modalities like X-rays, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) scans. The presented case highlights the importance of meticulous follow-up, as chronic pain manifested despite conservative management. The management of intrahepatic FBs depends on factors like size, location, and symptoms, with conservative approaches for stable patients. Surgical removal remains the mainstay of the treatment. Long-term monitoring is crucial to detect potential complications, and imaging studies play a key role in regular follow-up. Conclusion: Hepatic foreign bodies are rare, and symptoms vary based on size, type, and location, ranging from asymptomatic to complications such as abscess formation. Surgical removal is the main treatment, but in cases of noncomplicated hepatic foreign bodies, close follow-up is necessary.

Indexed as

case reportforeign body complicationshepatic injuryliterature reviewliver injurymetallic foreign bodyretained foreign body

Identifiers

PMID38694309
PMCPMC11060318
OpenAlexW4393008912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.